Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37322511›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Bipolar haemostatic forceps versus standard therapy by haemoclip + / - epinephrine injection as initial endoscopic treatment in active non-variceal upper GI bleeding: study protocol for a prospective, randomized multicentre trial (BeBop-Trial).

Daniel Schmitz, Lucas Thielemann, Felix Grassmann

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05353062 (Bipolar Hemostatic Forceps Versus Standard Therapy by Hemoclip and or Epinephrin Injection as Initial Endoscopic Treatment in Acute Non-variceal Upper GI Bleeding), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05353062 naunknown statusnot on this map

Bipolar Hemostatic Forceps Versus Standard Therapy by Hemoclip and or Epinephrin Injection as Initial Endoscopic Treatment in Acute Non-variceal Upper GI Bleeding: a Prospective, Randomized Multicenter Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorTheresienkrankenhaus und St. Hedwig-Klinik GmbHRan2023 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsGastrointestinal HemorrhageArmsHemostatic therapy, Endoscopic therapy with hemoclip +/- injection of epinephrine solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel SchmitzDepartment of Gastroenterology and Infectiology, Helios Kliniken Schwerin, University Campus of Medical School Hamburg, Wismarsche Str.393-397, Schwerin, 19055, Germany. Daniel.Schmitz@helios-gesundheit.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3273-8435
Lucas ThielemannDepartment of Gastroenterology and Infectiology, Helios Kliniken Schwerin, University Campus of Medical School Hamburg, Wismarsche Str.393-397, Schwerin, 19055, Germany.
Felix GrassmannDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Medical School Hamburg, Am Kaiserkai 1, Hamburg, 20457, Germany.
MSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with active nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) usually require urgent endoscopic treatment. Standard therapy (ST) using haemoclip + / - epinephrine injection is not always successful. Bipolar haemostatic forceps (HemoStat/Pentax®) are an approved medical device for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding. However, their use as a primary endoscopic treatment for active NVUGIB has not yet been proven in a randomized prospective study.

methodsThis is a prospective, randomized, multicentre superiority trial (n ≥ 5). Patients with active NVUGIB will be randomized (1:1) to ST and to experimental therapy (ET) by application of bipolar haemostatic forceps. In the case of failed initial treatment within 15 min, crossover treatment will be attempted first. Rescue treatment (e.g. via over-the-scope-clip) will then be allowed after 30 min. All patients will also receive standard therapy with proton pump inhibitors. Forty-five patients per treatment arm are required to demonstrate an absolute difference of 25.4% with a power of 80% and a significance level of 0.05. DISCUSSION: The hypothesis of the study is that bipolar haemostatic forceps are superior to ST in terms of successful primary haemostasis and the absence of recurrent bleeding within 30 days (combined endpoint). The 1:1 randomization is also ethically justifiable for this study, as both procedures are approved for the intervention in question. To further increase the safety of the patients in the study, crossover treatment and rescue treatment are planned. The prospective design seems feasible in a reasonable time frame (recruitment period of 12 months), as nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding is common. Anticoagulants and/or antiplatelet drugs could be an important confounding factor in the statistical analysis that needs to be taken into account and calculated if necessary. In conclusion, this randomized, prospective, multicentre study could make an important contribution to answering the question of whether bipolar haemostatic forceps could be the first-line therapy in the endoscopic treatment of stage Forrest I a + b NVUGIB.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05353062. Registered on April 30 2022.

Indexed as

EpinephrineHemostaticsEquivalence Trials as TopicGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgical InstrumentsTreatment OutcomeEpinephrineHemostaticsEndoscopicGastrointestinal haemorrhageHaemostasisRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID37322511
PMCPMC10268387
OpenAlexW4380871841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.