Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37322443›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023

Child-Sum EATree-LSTMs: enhanced attentive Child-Sum Tree-LSTMs for biomedical event extraction.

Lei Wang, Han Cao, Liu Yuan, Xiaoxu Guo, Yachao Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lei WangSchool of Computer Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Han CaoSchool of Computer Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China. caohan@snnu.edu.cn.
Liu YuanSchool of Computer Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Xiaoxu GuoSchool of Computer Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Yachao CuiSchool of Computer Science, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTree-structured neural networks have shown promise in extracting lexical representations of sentence syntactic structures, particularly in the detection of event triggers using recursive neural networks.

methodsIn this study, we introduce an attention mechanism into Child-Sum Tree-LSTMs for the detection of biomedical event triggers. We incorporate previous researches on assigning attention weights to adjacent nodes and integrate this mechanism into Child-Sum Tree-LSTMs to improve the detection of event trigger words. We also address a limitation of shallow syntactic dependencies in Child-Sum Tree-LSTMs by integrating deep syntactic dependencies to enhance the effect of the attention mechanism.

resultsOur proposed model, which integrates an enhanced attention mechanism into Tree-LSTM, shows the best performance for the MLEE and BioNLP'09 datasets. Moreover, our model outperforms almost all complex event categories for the BioNLP'09/11/13 test set.

conclusionWe evaluate the performance of our proposed model with the MLEE and BioNLP datasets and demonstrate the advantage of an enhanced attention mechanism in detecting biomedical event trigger words.

Indexed as

Data MiningNeural Networks, ComputerHumansAttentionChild-Sum Tree-LSTMsRecursive neural networkTree-structured

Identifiers

PMID37322443
PMCPMC10268412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.