Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37322441›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2023

Case-control association study of congenital heart disease from a tertiary paediatric cardiac centre from North India.

Prachi Kukshal, Radha O Joshi, Ajay Kumar, Shadab Ahamad, Prabhatha Rashmi Murthy, Yogesh Sathe, Krishna Manohar, Soma Guhathakurta, Subramanian Chellappan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Prachi KukshalSri Sathya Sai Sanjeevani Research Foundation, NH-2, Delhi-Mathura Highway, Baghola, Haryana, District Palwal, Pin- 121102, India. prachi7k@gmail.com.
Radha O JoshiPresent address Sri Sathya Sai Sanjeevani Research Foundation, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai- 410210, Maharashtra, India.
Ajay KumarSri Sathya Sai Sanjeevani Research Foundation, NH-2, Delhi-Mathura Highway, Baghola, Haryana, District Palwal, Pin- 121102, India.
Shadab AhamadSri Sathya Sai Sanjeevani Research Foundation, NH-2, Delhi-Mathura Highway, Baghola, Haryana, District Palwal, Pin- 121102, India.
Prabhatha Rashmi MurthySri Sathya Sai Sanjeevani Centre for Child Heart Care and Training in Paediatric Cardiac Skills, Navi Mumbai Maharashtra, India.
Yogesh SatheSri Sathya Sai Sanjeevani International Centre for Child Heart Care & Research, NH-2, Delhi-Mathura Highway, Baghola, District Palwal, Haryana, Pin 121102, India.
Krishna ManoharSri Sathya Sai Sanjeevani International Centre for Child Heart Care & Research, NH-2, Delhi-Mathura Highway, Baghola, District Palwal, Haryana, Pin 121102, India.
Soma GuhathakurtaSri Sathya Sai Sanjeevani Research Foundation, NH-2, Delhi-Mathura Highway, Baghola, Haryana, District Palwal, Pin- 121102, India.
Subramanian ChellappanSri Sathya Sai Sanjeevani International Centre for Child Heart Care & Research, NH-2, Delhi-Mathura Highway, Baghola, District Palwal, Haryana, Pin 121102, India. subramanianchellappan@gmail.com.
Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences · INSri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCongenital Heart diseases (CHDs) account for 1/3rd of all congenital birth defects. Etiopathogenesis of CHDs remain elusive despite extensive investigations globally. Phenotypic heterogeneity witnessed in this developmental disorder reiterate gene-environment interactions with periconceptional factors as risk conferring; and genetic analysis of both sporadic and familial forms of CHD suggest its multigenic basis. Significant association of de novo and inherited variants have been observed. Approximately 1/5th of CHDs are documented in the ethnically distinct Indian population but genetic insights have been very limited. This pilot case-control based association study was undertaken to investigate the status of Caucasian SNPs in a north Indian cohort.

methodA total of 306 CHD cases sub-classified into n = 198 acyanotic and n = 108 cyanotic types were recruited from a dedicated tertiary paediatric cardiac centre in Palwal, Haryana. 23 SNPs primarily prioritized from Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on Caucasians were genotyped using Agena MassARRAY Technology and test of association was performed with adequately numbered controls.

resultsFifty percent of the studied SNPs were substantially associated in either allelic, genotypic or sub-phenotype categories validating their strong correlation with disease manifestation. Of note, strongest allelic association was observed for rs73118372 in CRELD1 (p < 0.0001) on Chr3, rs28711516 in MYH6 (p = 0.00083) and rs735712 in MYH7 (p = 0.0009) both on Chr 14 and were also significantly associated with acyanotic, and cyanotic categories separately. rs28711516 (p = 0.003) and rs735712 (p = 0.002) also showed genotypic association. Strongest association was observed with rs735712(p = 0.003) in VSD and maximum association was observed for ASD sub-phenotypes.

conclusionsCaucasian findings were partly replicated in the north Indian population. The findings suggest the contribution of genetic, environmental and sociodemographic factors, warranting continued investigations in this study population.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyHeart Defects, CongenitalCase-Control StudiesGenotypeHumansIndiaWhite PeopleCase–control associationCongenital Heart DiseaseGWAS variantsNorth India

Identifiers

PMID37322441
PMCPMC10268439
OpenAlexW4380788955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.