SynthesisRheumatology international2023
Patient self-reported instruments for assessing symptoms in rheumatoid arthritis.
Synthesis in Rheumatology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Longitudinal Relationship Between Pain and Depression in People With Inflammatory Arthritis: A Narrative Review.Arthritis care & research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic joint autoimmune disease with a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms due to the burden of the disease. There are several patient-self-depression scales used for the assessment and a wide range of variations in the prevalence of depression could be related to this. No evidence was found that reports the most accurate, sensitive, and specific depression instrument through an extensive review in the literature. To determine the most precise depression instrument to evaluate RA patients. A systematic review search was directed, considering type of study, prevalence of depressive symptoms, usage of validated depression scales, and reported scale performance measurements. The data extraction followed the PRISMA guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, ROBINS-I, and QUADAS-2. From a total of 1958, only 28 articles included in the analysis. The total number of patients analyzed was 6405, with a mean age of 56.53 years, 4474 women (75.22%), and a mean prevalence of depressive symptoms of 27.4%. The most frequent and the best scale used was the CES-D (n = 12), considering all characteristics. The CES-D reported the best psychometric properties, and it was the most frequently used tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.