Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37322291›Full record

ArticleNature cell biology2023

An atlas of rabbit development as a model for single-cell comparative genomics.

Mai-Linh Nu Ton, Daniel Keitley, Bart Theeuwes, Carolina Guibentif, Jonas Ahnfelt-Rønne, Thomas Kjærgaard Andreassen, Fernando J Calero-Nieto, Ivan Imaz-Rosshandler, Blanca Pijuan-Sala, Jennifer Nichols and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cell biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Primate amnion development.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mai-Linh Nu Ton *Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6965-0528
Daniel Keitley *Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Bart TheeuwesDepartment of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Carolina GuibentifInst. Biomedicine, Dept. Microbiology and Immunology, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1056-9922
Jonas Ahnfelt-RønneGlobal Discovery & Development Sciences, Novo Nordisk A/S, Måløv, Denmark.
Thomas Kjærgaard AndreassenGlobal Discovery & Development Sciences, Novo Nordisk A/S, Måløv, Denmark.
Fernando J Calero-NietoDepartment of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3358-8253
Ivan Imaz-RosshandlerDepartment of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Blanca Pijuan-SalaGenome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Jennifer NicholsMRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Èlia Benito-GutiérrezDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. eb647@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2435-0948
John C MarioniWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK. marioni@ebi.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9092-0852
Berthold GöttgensDepartment of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. bg200@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6302-5705

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17230Wellcome Trust 203151Wellcome Trust 220379Wellcome Trust 226309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, the mouse has been the favoured vertebrate model for biomedical research, due to its experimental and genetic tractability. However, non-rodent embryological studies highlight that many aspects of early mouse development, such as its egg-cylinder gastrulation and method of implantation, diverge from other mammals, thus complicating inferences about human development. Like the human embryo, rabbits develop as a flat-bilaminar disc. Here we constructed a morphological and molecular atlas of rabbit development. We report transcriptional and chromatin accessibility profiles for over 180,000 single cells and high-resolution histology sections from embryos spanning gastrulation, implantation, amniogenesis and early organogenesis. Using a neighbourhood comparison pipeline, we compare the transcriptional landscape of rabbit and mouse at the scale of the entire organism. We characterize the gene regulatory programmes underlying trophoblast differentiation and identify signalling interactions involving the yolk sac mesothelium during haematopoiesis. We demonstrate how the combination of both rabbit and mouse atlases can be leveraged to extract new biological insights from sparse macaque and human data. The datasets and computational pipelines reported here set a framework for a broader cross-species approach to decipher early mammalian development, and are readily adaptable to deploy single-cell comparative genomics more broadly across biomedical research.

Indexed as

GastrulationOrganogenesisAnimalsCell DifferentiationEmbryo ImplantationEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentHumansMammalsMiceRabbits

Identifiers

PMID37322291
PMCPMC7618511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.