Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37322285›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2023

Growth rate is a dominant factor predicting the rhizosphere effect.

José L López, Arista Fourie, Sanne W M Poppeliers, Nikolaos Pappas, Juan J Sánchez-Gil, Ronnie de Jonge, Bas E Dutilh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Root colonization by beneficial rhizobacteria.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Fast-growingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

José L LópezTheoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Science for Life, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-7032
Arista FourieTheoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Science for Life, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4931-7626
Sanne W M PoppeliersPlant-Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Science for Life, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Nikolaos PappasTheoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Science for Life, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8540-4324
Juan J Sánchez-GilPlant-Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Science for Life, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2504-5497
Ronnie de JongePlant-Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Science for Life, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-8538
Bas E DutilhTheoretical Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, Science for Life, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. bedutilh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2329-7890

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The root microbiome is shaped by plant root activity, which selects specific microbial taxa from the surrounding soil. This influence on the microorganisms and soil chemistry in the immediate vicinity of the roots has been referred to as the rhizosphere effect. Understanding the traits that make bacteria successful in the rhizosphere is critical for developing sustainable agriculture solutions. In this study, we compared the growth rate potential, a complex trait that can be predicted from bacterial genome sequences, to functional traits encoded by proteins. We analyzed 84 paired rhizosphere- and soil-derived 16S rRNA gene amplicon datasets from 18 different plants and soil types, performed differential abundance analysis, and estimated growth rates for each bacterial genus. We found that bacteria with higher growth rate potential consistently dominated the rhizosphere, and this trend was confirmed in different bacterial phyla using genome sequences of 3270 bacterial isolates and 6707 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from 1121 plant- and soil-associated metagenomes. We then identified which functional traits were enriched in MAGs according to their niche or growth rate status. We found that predicted growth rate potential was the main feature for differentiating rhizosphere and soil bacteria in machine learning models, and we then analyzed the features that were important for achieving faster growth rates, which makes bacteria more competitive in the rhizosphere. As growth rate potential can be predicted from genomic data, this work has implications for understanding bacterial community assembly in the rhizosphere, where many uncultivated bacteria reside.

Indexed as

RhizosphereSoil MicrobiologyBacteriaPlant RootsPlantsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil

Identifiers

PMID37322285
PMCPMC10432406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.