Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37322127›Full record

ArticleNature plants2023

Comparative phylotranscriptomics reveals ancestral and derived root nodule symbiosis programmes.

Cyril Libourel, Jean Keller, Lukas Brichet, Anne-Claire Cazalé, Sébastien Carrère, Tatiana Vernié, Jean-Malo Couzigou, Caroline Callot, Isabelle Dufau, Stéphane Cauet and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature plants, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
23.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Microbial drivers of root plasticity.The New phytologist · 2025
    Review
  13. Convergent evolution ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cyril Libourel *Laboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales (LRSV), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse INP, Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4271-9596
Jean Keller *Laboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales (LRSV), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse INP, Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5198-0331
Lukas BrichetLIPME, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, CNRS, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Anne-Claire CazaléLIPME, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, CNRS, Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6822-7186
Sébastien CarrèreLIPME, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, CNRS, Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2348-0778
Tatiana VerniéLaboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales (LRSV), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse INP, Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1387-6370
Jean-Malo CouzigouLaboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales (LRSV), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse INP, Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1362-6286
Caroline CallotINRAE, CNRGV French Plant Genomic Resource Center, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Isabelle DufauINRAE, CNRGV French Plant Genomic Resource Center, Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2020-7423
Stéphane CauetINRAE, CNRGV French Plant Genomic Resource Center, Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4985-8940
William MarandeINRAE, CNRGV French Plant Genomic Resource Center, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Tabatha BulachINRAE, US1426, GeT-PlaGe, Genotoul, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Amandine SuinINRAE, US1426, GeT-PlaGe, Genotoul, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Catherine Masson-BoivinLIPME, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, CNRS, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Philippe RemigiLIPME, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, CNRS, Castanet-Tolosan, France. philippe.remigi@inrae.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9023-3788
Pierre-Marc DelauxLaboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales (LRSV), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse INP, Castanet-Tolosan, France. pierre-marc.delaux@cnrs.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6211-157X
Delphine CapelaLIPME, Université de Toulouse, INRAE, CNRS, Castanet-Tolosan, France. delphine.capela@inrae.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3891-672X
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-10-LABX-41Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency) ANR-18-EURE-0019Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) OPP1172165EC | EC Seventh Framework Programm | FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions (FP7-PEOPLE - Specific Programme "People" Implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013)) 609398EC | EC Seventh Framework Programm | FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions (FP7-PEOPLE - Specific Programme "People" Implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013)) 845838EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 101001675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symbiotic interactions such as the nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbiosis (RNS) have structured ecosystems during the evolution of life. Here we aimed at reconstructing ancestral and intermediate steps that shaped RNS observed in extant flowering plants. We compared the symbiotic transcriptomic responses of nine host plants, including the mimosoid legume Mimosa pudica for which we assembled a chromosome-level genome. We reconstructed the ancestral RNS transcriptome composed of most known symbiotic genes together with hundreds of novel candidates. Cross-referencing with transcriptomic data in response to experimentally evolved bacterial strains with gradual symbiotic proficiencies, we found the response to bacterial signals, nodule infection, nodule organogenesis and nitrogen fixation to be ancestral. By contrast, the release of symbiosomes was associated with recently evolved genes encoding small proteins in each lineage. We demonstrate that the symbiotic response was mostly in place in the most recent common ancestor of the RNS-forming species more than 90 million years ago.

Indexed as

FabaceaeSymbiosisBacteriaEcosystemNitrogen Fixation

Identifiers

PMID37322127
PMCPMC10356618
OpenAlexW4380872045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.