Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37321986›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

A dorsomedial prefrontal cortex-based dynamic functional connectivity model of rumination.

Jungwoo Kim, Jessica R Andrews-Hanna, Hedwig Eisenbarth, Byeol Kim Lux, Hong Ji Kim, Eunjin Lee, Martin A Lindquist, Elizabeth A Reynolds Losin, Tor D Wager, Choong-Wan Woo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Disorganisation and depression: a re-examination of how we think and speak when depressed.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Jungwoo Kim *Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9139-0232
Jessica R Andrews-Hanna *Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Hedwig EisenbarthSchool of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0521-2630
Byeol Kim LuxCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2691-2334
Hong Ji KimCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, South Korea.
Eunjin LeeCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9465-6008
Martin A LindquistDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Elizabeth A Reynolds LosinDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Tor D WagerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. tor.d.wager@dartmouth.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1936-5574
Choong-Wan WooCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, South Korea. waniwoo@g.skku.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7423-5422
Institute for Basic Science · KRDartmouth College · USJohns Hopkins University · USPennsylvania State University · USSK Group (South Korea) · KRUniversity of Arizona · USVictoria University of Wellington · NZ

Funding

The Neural Bases of Placebo Effects and their Relation to Regulatory ProcessesR01MH076136 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI WAGER, TOR D. · 2007 to 2023
$8.5M
Brain and Genetic Predictors of Individual Differences in Pain and Placebo AnalgesiaR01DA046064 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI FRIEDMAN, NAOMI P., WAGER, TOR D. · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
fMRI-based Biomarkers for Multiple Components of PainR01DA035484 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI WAGER, TOR D. · 2013 to 2017
$3.1M
Psychological and brain mechanisms underlying disparities in opioid and non-opioid pain treatment decisionsK01DA045735 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI LOSIN, ELIZABETH R · 2018 to 2022
$861k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA045735NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035484NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046064NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rumination is a cognitive style characterized by repetitive thoughts about one's negative internal states and is a common symptom of depression. Previous studies have linked trait rumination to alterations in the default mode network, but predictive brain markers of rumination are lacking. Here, we adopt a predictive modeling approach to develop a neuroimaging marker of rumination based on the variance of dynamic resting-state functional connectivity and test it across 5 diverse subclinical and clinical samples (total n = 288). A whole-brain marker based on dynamic connectivity with the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) emerges as generalizable across the subclinical datasets. A refined marker consisting of the most important features from a virtual lesion analysis further predicts depression scores of adults with major depressive disorder (n = 35). This study highlights the role of the dmPFC in trait rumination and provides a dynamic functional connectivity marker for rumination.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderAdultBrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrefrontal Cortex

Identifiers

PMID37321986
PMCPMC10272121
OpenAlexW4380789195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.