Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37321849›Full record

SynthesisOccupational and environmental medicine2023

Workplace mental health screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jessica Strudwick, Aimee Gayed, Mark Deady, Sam Haffar, Sophia Mobbs, Aiysha Malik, Aemal Akhtar, Taylor Braund, Richard A Bryant, Samuel B Harvey

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Voluntary HIV Testing and Counselling Initiatives in Occupational Settings: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The role of the occupational physician in the early detection of occupational diseases.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jessica StrudwickBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7269-9904
Aimee GayedBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia a.gayed@blackdog.org.au.
Mark DeadyBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Sam HaffarBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Sophia MobbsBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Aiysha MalikDepartment of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.
Aemal AkhtarSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Taylor BraundBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Richard A BryantSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Samuel B HarveyBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9580-3743
Black Dog Institute · AUKarolinska Institutet · SEUNSW Sydney · AUWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workplaces are an important location for population mental health interventions. Screening to detect employees at risk of or experiencing mental ill health is increasingly common. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy of workplace mental health screening programmes on employee mental health, work outcomes, user satisfaction, positive mental health, quality of life, help-seeking and adverse effects. PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Global Index Medicus, Global Health and SciELO were searched (database inception-10 November 2022) and results screened by two independent reviewers. Controlled trials evaluating screening of workers' mental health as related to their employment were included. Random effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled effect sizes for each outcome of interest. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was conducted to evaluate the certainty of findings. Of the 12 328 records screened, 11 were included. These reported 8 independent trials collectively assessing 2940 employees. Results indicated screening followed by advice or referral was ineffective in improving employee mental health symptoms (n=3; d=-0.07 (95% CI -0.29 to 0.15)). Screening followed by facilitated access to treatment interventions demonstrated a small improvement in mental health (n=4; d=-0.22 (95% CI -0.42 to -0.02)). Limited effects were observed for other outcomes. Certainty ranged from low to very low. The evidence supporting workplace mental health screening programmes is limited and available data suggest mental health screening alone does not improve worker mental health. Substantial variation in the implementation of screening was observed. Further research disentangling the independent effect of screening alongside the efficacy of other interventions to prevent mental ill health at work is required.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersMental HealthEmploymentHumansQuality of LifeWorkplaceMental HealthOccupational HealthPublic Health Surveillance

Identifiers

PMID37321849
PMCPMC10423530
OpenAlexW4380786014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.