Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37321659›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2023

Faster, higher, stronger - together? A bibliometric analysis of author distribution in top medical education journals.

Dawit Wondimagegn, Cynthia Ruth Whitehead, Carrie Cartmill, Eloy Rodrigues, Antónia Correia, Tiago Salessi Lins, Manuel João Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dawit WondimagegnCollege of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Oromia, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-5035-3731
Cynthia Ruth WhiteheadThe Wilson Centre, University Health Network and Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0134-9074
Carrie CartmillThe Wilson Centre, University Health Network and Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6996-7293
Eloy RodriguesDocumentation and Library Services, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7862-2681
Antónia CorreiaDocumentation and Library Services, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6610-8853
Tiago Salessi LinsDepartment of Health Promotion, Federal University of Paraiba, Paraiba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5587-4504
Manuel João CostaSchool of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal mmcosta@med.uminho.pt.ORCID 0000-0001-5255-4257

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedical education and medical education research are growing industries that have become increasingly globalised. Recognition of the colonial foundations of medical education has led to a growing focus on issues of equity, absence and marginalisation. One area of absence that has been underexplored is that of published voices from low-income and middle-income countries. We undertook a bibliometric analysis of five top medical education journals to determine which countries were absent and which countries were represented in prestigious first and last authorship positions.

methodsWeb of Science was searched for all articles and reviews published between 2012 and 2021 within

resultsOur analysis revealed a dominance of first and last authors from five countries: USA, Canada, UK, Netherlands and Australia. Authors from these five countries had first or last authored 70% of publications. Of the 195 countries in the world, 43% (approximately 83) were not represented by a single publication. There was an increase in the percentage of publications from outside of these five countries from 23% in 2012 to 40% in 2021.

conclusionThe dominance of wealthy nations within spaces that claim to be international is a finding that requires attention. We draw on analogies from modern Olympic sport and our own collaborative research process to show how academic publishing continues to be a colonised space that advantages those from wealthy and English-speaking countries.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchEducation, MedicalPeriodicals as TopicAuthorshipBibliometricsHumansHealth services researchHealth systems

Identifiers

PMID37321659
PMCPMC10367082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.