ArticleClinical and experimental pediatrics2023
Inferior vena cava to aorta ratio in dehydrated pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Clinical and experimental pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Hepatorenal Index in Pediatric Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Clinical value of the caval-aortic index and inferior vena cava diameter for volume assessment in hypernatremic patients.PloS one · 2026Observational
- Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Rotavirus Infections: Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Noninvasive and simple, but accurate? Meta-analysis of evidence-based point-of-care ultrasound for assessing dehydration in children.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDehydration due to acute diarrhea is among the leading causes of mortality. However, advancements in management and technology do not help clinicians differentiate dehydration degrees. Ultrasound using the inferior vena cava to aorta (IVC/ Ao) ratio is a promising noninvasive technique to identify significant pediatric dehydration. PUSPOSE: Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the diagnostic parameters of the IVC/Ao ratio for predicting clinically significant dehydration in pediatric patients.
methodsWe searched the MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases for studies of pediatric patients (≤18 years old) who presented with signs and symptoms of dehydration due to acute diarrhea, gastroenteritis, or vomiting. The inclusion criteria were cross-sectional, case-control, cohort, and randomized controlled trial study design and publication in any language. We then conducted a meta-analysis using the midas and metandi commands from Stata software.
resultsFive studies of 461 patients were included. The combined sensitivity was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79%-91%), while the specificity was 73% (95% CI, 59%-84%). The area under the curve was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.91). The positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 3.2 (95% CI, 2.1-5.1) with a 76% posttest probability, while the negative likelihood ratio (LR-) was 0.18 (95% CI, 0.12-0.28) with a 16% posttest probability. The combined negative predictive value was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75-0.91), while the positive predictive value was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68-0.82).
conclusionThe IVC/Ao ratio was insufficient to exclude or confirm significant dehydration in pediatric patients. More studies are needed, especially multicenter, adequately powered diagnostic research, to will help establish the usefulness of the IVC/Ao ratio.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.