Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37321277›Full record

ArticleAppetite2023

Leveraging ecological momentary assessment to understand variability in food parenting practices within a low-income racially/ethnically diverse sample of parents of preschoolers.

K A Loth, Z Huang, J Wolfson, D Neumark-Sztainer, J Fisher, J A Fulkerson, J M Berge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

K A LothDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. Electronic address: kloth@umn.edu.
Z HuangDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
J WolfsonDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
D Neumark-SztainerDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
J FisherDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
J A FulkersonSchool of Nursing, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
J M BergeDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Eating, Activity, and Weight-Related Problems Across the Life Course in Diverse PopulationsR35HL139853 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI NEUMARK-SZTAINER, DIANNE R · 2018 to 2024
$6.4M
An exploration of the momentary mechanisms of controlling food-related parenting practices among mothers and fathers of preschool childrenK23HD090324 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LOTH, KATIE ANN · 2017 to 2020
$473k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NHLBI NIH HHS R35 HL139853NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD090324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children's eating behaviors are shaped significantly by their home food environment, including exposure to food parenting practices. The current study leveraged ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to describe how food parenting practices used to feed preschoolers (n = 116) differed across contextual factors around eating, including type of eating occasion (i.e., meals vs. snacks), day of the week (i.e., weekend vs. weekday), who initiated the meal (parent vs. child), emotional climate of the eating occasion. Parent perceptions of how well the eating occasion went, including how well the child ate and whether the food parenting practices worked as intended were also explored. Parent use of specific food parenting practices, situated within four higher-order domains (i.e., structure, autonomy support, coercive control, indulgent), was found to differ by type of eating occasion; parents engaged in a higher proportion of structure practices at meals than at snacks. Use of specific food parenting practices differed by mealtime emotional climate; parent use of structure and autonomy support was associated with eating occasions described as relaxed, enjoyable, neutral, and fun. Finally, parent perception of how well the child ate differed by use of specific food parenting practices; during eating occasions when parent's felt their child ate "not enough", they used less autonomy support and more coercive control compared to eating occasions where the child ate "enough and a good balance." Leveraging EMA allowed for increased understanding of the variability in food parenting practices and contextual factors. Findings may be utilized to inform the development of larger-scale studies seeking to understand why parents choose specific approaches to feeding their children, as well as the impact of various approaches to child feeding on child health outcomes.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentParentingChildFeeding BehaviorHumansMealsParent-Child RelationsParentsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37321277
PMCPMC10527935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.