ArticleNeuron2023
An internal model for canceling self-generated sensory input in freely behaving electric fish.
Article in Neuron, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Central coordination of electromotor and locomotor pathways in the weakly electric fish Brevimyrus niger.Research square · 2026Article
- Dynamic vibration-driven feedback shapes predator-prey interactions in an orb-weaving spider.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Motor Prediction Reduces Beta-Band Power and Enhances Cerebellar-Somatosensory Connectivity before Self-Touch to Enable Its Attenuation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Cerebellar Time and Relative Time: A Comparator-Based Dynamical Timing Model and its Relevance to Psychopathology and Therapies.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Review
- Desegregation of neuronal predictive processing.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Correctness is its own reward: bootstrapping error signals in self-guided reinforcement learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Unsupervised discovery and predictive sensorimotor transformation of spider prey capture through active vibration sensing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The extraordinary enigma of ordinary tickle behavior: Why gargalesis still puzzles neuroscience.Science advances · 2025Review
- An end-to-end model of active electrosensation.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- Tracking spatial patterns and daily modulation of behavior in a natural population of the pulse-type weakly electric fish,iScience · 2025Article
- Predictions of bimanual self-touch determine the temporal tuning of somatosensory perception.iScience · 2025Article
- Presynaptic inhibition selectively suppresses leg proprioception in behavingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- A perspective on neuroethology: what the past teaches us about the future of neuroethology.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024Review
- Learning within a sensory-motor circuit links action to expected outcome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Internal models that predict the sensory consequences of motor actions are vital for sensory, motor, and cognitive functions. However, the relationship between motor action and sensory input is complex, often varying from one moment to another depending on the state of the animal and the environment. The neural mechanisms for generating predictions under such challenging, real-world conditions remain largely unknown. Using novel methods for underwater neural recording, a quantitative analysis of unconstrained behavior, and computational modeling, we provide evidence for an unexpectedly sophisticated internal model at the first stage of active electrosensory processing in mormyrid fish. Closed-loop manipulations reveal that electrosensory lobe neurons are capable of simultaneously learning and storing multiple predictions of the sensory consequences of motor commands specific to different sensory states. These results provide mechanistic insights into how internal motor signals and information about the sensory environment are combined within a cerebellum-like circuitry to predict the sensory consequences of natural behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.