Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37319372›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science & technology2023

How Many Chemicals in Commerce Have Been Analyzed in Environmental Media? A 50 Year Bibliometric Analysis.

Derek C G Muir, Gordon J Getzinger, Matt McBride, P Lee Ferguson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Silicone Wristbands for Measuring Human Exposure to Organic Chemicals: Uses and Benefits for Human Biological Research.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. AnEnvironmental science & technology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Derek C G MuirEnvironment & Climate Change Canada, Burlington, Ontario L7S1A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6631-9776
Gordon J GetzingerSchool of Environmental Sustainability, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60660, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5628-1425
Matt McBrideCAS IP Services, CAS, Columbus, Ohio 43202, United States.
P Lee FergusonDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8367-7521

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 50 years, there has been a tremendous expansion in the measurement of chemical contaminants in environmental media. But how many chemicals have actually been determined, and do they represent a significant fraction of substances in commerce or of chemicals of concern? To address these questions, we conducted a bibliometric survey to identify what individual chemicals have been determined in environmental media and their trends over the past 50 years. The CAplus database of CAS, a Division of the American Chemical Society, was searched for indexing roles "analytical study" and "pollutant" yielding a final list of 19,776 CAS Registry Numbers (CASRNs). That list was then used to link the CASRNs to biological studies, yielding a data set of 9.251 × 10

Indexed as

Environmental PollutantsBibliometricsCommerceDatabases, FactualIndustryUnited StatesEnvironmental Pollutantsanalytical studybibliometric surveychemical inventoriescitation countsenvironmental measurementpollutant

Identifiers

PMID37319372
PMCPMC10308830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.