Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37319290›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2023

Cost-effectiveness of personalised telehealth intervention for chronic disease management: A pilot randomised controlled trial.

Shalika Bohingamu Mudiyanselage, Jo Stevens, Julian Toscano, Mark A Kotowicz, Christopher L Steinfort, Robyn Hayles, Jennifer J Watts

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Economic evaluation of mHealth solutions in PD: where do we stand?Neurodegenerative disease management · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shalika Bohingamu MudiyanselageDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1090-4401
Jo StevensBarwon Health, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Julian ToscanoBarwon Health, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Mark A KotowiczBarwon Health, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Christopher L SteinfortBarwon Health, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Robyn HaylesBarwon Health, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Jennifer J WattsDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8095-8638

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of a personalised telehealth intervention to manage chronic disease in the long run.

methodThe Personalised Health Care (PHC) pilot study was a randomised trial with an economic evaluation alongside over 12 months. From a health service perspective, the primary analysis compared the costs and effectiveness of PHC telehealth monitoring with usual care. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated based on costs and health-related quality of life. The PHC intervention was implemented in the Barwon Health region, Geelong, Australia, for patients with a diagnosis of COPD and/or diabetes who had a high likelihood of hospital readmission over 12 months.

resultsWhen compared to usual care at 12 months, the PHC intervention cost AUD$714 extra per patient (95%CI -4879; 6308) with a significant improvement of 0.09 in health-related quality of life (95%CI: 0.05; 0.14). The probability of PHC being cost-effective by 12 months was close to 65%, at willingness to pay a threshold of AUD$50,000 per quality-adjusted life year.

conclusionBenefits of PHC to patients and the health system at 12 months translated to a gain in quality-adjusted life years with a non-significant cost difference between the intervention and control groups. Given the relatively high set-up costs of the PHC intervention, the program may need to be offered to a larger population to achieve cost-effectiveness. Long-term follow-up is required to assess the real health and economic benefits over time.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeTelemedicineCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareHumansPilot ProjectsQuality-Adjusted Life Years

Identifiers

PMID37319290
PMCPMC10270614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.