Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37318875›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Audit, Feedback, and Education to Improve Quality and Outcomes in Transurethral Resection and Single-Instillation Intravesical Chemotherapy for Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Treatment: Protocol for a Multicenter International Observational Study With an Embedded Cluster Randomized Trial.

Kevin Gallagher, Nikita Bhatt, Keiran Clement, Eleanor Zimmermann, Sinan Khadhouri, Steven MacLennan, Meghana Kulkarni, Fortis Gaba, Thineskrishna Anbarasan, Aqua Asif and 15 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05154084 (Transurethral REsection and Single Instillation Intra-vesical Chemotherapy Evaluation in Bladder Cancer Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05154084 completednot on this map

Transurethral REsection and Single Instillation Intra-vesical Chemotherapy Evaluation in Bladder Cancer Treatment (RESECT) Improving Quality in TURBT Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorBritish Urology Researchers in Surgical TrainingRan2021 to 2023Enrolled19,505ConditionsBladder CancerArmsPerformance feedback and education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 12 institutions in 4 countries.

Kevin GallagherDepartment of Urology, Western General Hospital Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5485-5336
Nikita BhattBritish Urology Researchers in Surgical Training, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8554-4335
Keiran ClementBritish Urology Researchers in Surgical Training, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5251-7795
Eleanor ZimmermannBritish Urology Researchers in Surgical Training, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2866-3933
Sinan KhadhouriBritish Urology Researchers in Surgical Training, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1836-8992
Steven MacLennanHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2691-8421
Meghana KulkarniBritish Urology Researchers in Surgical Training, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4222-7647
Fortis GabaBritish Urology Researchers in Surgical Training, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5103-5786
Thineskrishna AnbarasanBritish Urology Researchers in Surgical Training, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1049-0093
Aqua AsifBritish Urology Researchers in Surgical Training, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3233-7428
Alexander LightBritish Urology Researchers in Surgical Training, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7246-3651
Alexander NgBritish Urology Researchers in Surgical Training, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5441-2017
Vinson ChanBritish Urology Researchers in Surgical Training, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6108-9315
Arjun NathanBritish Urology Researchers in Surgical Training, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8572-2832
David CooperHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9361-4399
Lorna AucottHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6277-7972
Gautier MarcqUrology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1806-1448
Jeremy Yuen-Chun TeohS H Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9361-2342
Patrick HensleyDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8098-901X
Eilidh DuncanHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1009-9732
Beatriz GoulaoHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1490-7183
Tim O'BrienDepartment of Urology, Guy's and St. Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0456-0756
Matthew NielsenDepartment of Urology, University of North Carolina Medical School, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7853-9095
Paramananthan MariappanEdinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery, Department of Urology, Western General Hospital Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8221-4640
Veeru KasivisvanathanBritish Urology Researchers in Surgical Training, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0832-382X
British Association of Urological Surgeons · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBNational Health Service · GBWestern General Hospital · GBChinese University of Hong Kong · HKHarvard University · USInstitut Pasteur de Lille · FRNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSt George's Hospital · GBUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) accounts for 75% of bladder cancers. It is common and costly. Cost and detriment to patient outcomes and quality of life are driven by high recurrence rates and the need for regular invasive surveillance and repeat treatments. There is evidence that the quality of the initial surgical procedure (transurethral resection of bladder tumor [TURBT]) and administration of postoperative bladder chemotherapy significantly reduce cancer recurrence rates and improve outcomes (cancer progression and mortality). There is surgeon-reported evidence that TURBT practice varies significantly across surgeons and sites. There is limited evidence from clinical trials of intravesical chemotherapy that NMIBC recurrence rate varies significantly between sites and that this cannot be accounted for by differences in patient, tumor, or adjuvant treatment factors, suggesting that how the surgery is performed may be a reason for the variation.

objectiveThis study primarily aims to determine if feedback on and education about surgical quality indicators can improve performance and secondarily if this can reduce cancer recurrence rates. Planned secondary analyses aim to determine what surgeon, operative, perioperative, institutional, and patient factors are associated with better achievement of TURBT quality indicators and NMIBC recurrence rates.

methodsThis is an observational, international, multicenter study with an embedded cluster randomized trial of audit, feedback, and education. Sites will be included if they perform TURBT for NMIBC. The study has four phases: (1) site registration and usual practice survey; (2) retrospective audit; (3) randomization to audit, feedback, and education intervention or to no intervention; and (4) prospective audit. Local and national ethical and institutional approvals or exemptions will be obtained at each participating site.

resultsThe study has 4 coprimary outcomes, which are 4 evidence-based TURBT quality indicators: a surgical performance factor (detrusor muscle resection); an adjuvant treatment factor (intravesical chemotherapy administration); and 2 documentation factors (resection completeness and tumor features). A key secondary outcome is the early cancer recurrence rate. The intervention is a web-based surgical performance feedback dashboard with educational and practical resources for TURBT quality improvement. It will include anonymous site and surgeon-level peer comparison, a performance summary, and targets. The coprimary outcomes will be analyzed at the site level while recurrence rate will be analyzed at the patient level. The study was funded in October 2020 and began data collection in April 2021. As of January 2023, there were 220 hospitals participating and over 15,000 patient records. Projected data collection end date is June 30, 2023.

conclusionsThis study aims to use a distributed collaborative model to deliver a site-level web-based performance feedback intervention to improve the quality of endoscopic bladder cancer surgery. The study is funded and projects to complete data collection in June 2023.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.org NCT05154084; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05154084. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/42254.

Indexed as

bladder cancerevaluationfeedbackoncologyperformanceperformance feedbackquality improvementquality indicatorrecurrencesurgerysurgicaltransurethral resectionTURBTurology

Identifiers

PMID37318875
PMCPMC10337449
OpenAlexW4360596216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.