Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37318865›Full record

ArticleJMIR cardio2023

Cardiac Rehabilitation Facebook Intervention: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lee Anne Siegmund, James F Bena, Shannon L Morrison

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cardio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02971813 (Feasibility of a Social Media Intervention for Exercise Motivation and Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02971813 nacompletednot on this map

Feasibility of a Social Media Intervention for Exercise Motivation and Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Cleveland ClinicRan2017 to 2019Enrolled22ConditionsCardiovascular DiseasesArmsFacebook
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lee Anne SiegmundNursing Research and Innovation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9606-306X
James F BenaQuantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7592-0480
Shannon L MorrisonQuantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9507-1762
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe adherence to cardiac rehabilitation is low. Social media has been used to improve motivation and cardiac rehabilitation completion, but the authors did not find Facebook interventions for these purposes in the literature.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Facebook Intervention (Chat) for affecting changes in exercise motivation and need satisfaction and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation.

methodsThe Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3 and Psychological Need Satisfaction for Exercise were used to measure motivation and need satisfaction (competence, autonomy, and relatedness) before and after the Chat intervention. To support need satisfaction, the intervention included educational posts, supportive posts, and interaction with peers. The feasibility measures included recruitment, engagement, and acceptability. Groups were compared using analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Paired t tests were used to assess motivation and need satisfaction change, and Pearson or Spearman correlations were used for continuous variables.

resultsA total of 32 participants were lost to follow-up and 22 were included in the analysis. Higher motivation at intake (relative autonomy index 0.53, 95% CI 0.14-0.78; P=.01) and change in need satisfaction-autonomy (relative autonomy index 0.61, 95% CI 0.09-0.87; P=.02) were associated with more completed sessions. No between-group differences were found. Engagement included "likes" (n=210) and "hits" (n=157). For acceptability, mean scores on a 1 (not at all) to 5 (quite a bit) Likert scale for feeling supported and in touch with providers were 4.6 and 4.4, respectively.

conclusionsAcceptability of the Chat group was high; however, intervention feasibility could not be determined due to the small sample size. Those with greater motivation at intake completed more sessions, indicating its importance in cardiac rehabilitation completion. Despite challenges with recruitment and engagement, important lessons were learned.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02971813; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02971813. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/resprot.7554.

Indexed as

adherencecardiac rehabilitationcardiologyexerciseFacebookmotivationpeer supportphysical activityrehabilitationsatisfactionsocial media

Identifiers

PMID37318865
PMCPMC10334713
OpenAlexW4380871538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.