Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37318808›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2023

A Cognitive Biotype of Depression and Symptoms, Behavior Measures, Neural Circuits, and Differential Treatment Outcomes: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Laura M Hack, Leonardo Tozzi, Samantha Zenteno, Alisa M Olmsted, Rachel Hilton, Jenna Jubeir, Mayuresh S Korgaonkar, Alan F Schatzberg, Jerome A Yesavage, Ruth O'Hara and 1 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00693849 (International Study to Predict Optimised Treatment - in Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 65 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
24.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00693849 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

International Study to Predict Optimised Treatment - in Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorBRC Operations Pty. Ltd.Ran2008 to 2019Enrolled2,688ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsEscitalopram, Sertraline, Venlafaxine-XR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Distinct Biotypes of Visual Perception in Major Depressive Disorder.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Disorganisation and depression: a re-examination of how we think and speak when depressed.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. to extrapolation of primary absorbed compounds as multifunctional proxies of Zhiqiao ()-Houpo () herb pair.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2026
    Article
  16. Do sex and gender matter in the pharmacological treatment of depression?Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Cognition in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Obstacles and Challenges?Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura M HackDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Leonardo TozziDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Samantha ZentenoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Alisa M OlmstedDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Rachel HiltonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Jenna JubeirDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Mayuresh S KorgaonkarBrain Dynamic Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Alan F SchatzbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Jerome A YesavageDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Ruth O'HaraDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Leanne M WilliamsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Stanford University · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · USMental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Centers · USThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical & Translational Education and Research (Spectrum)UL1TR003142 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'HARA, RUTH M · 2019 to 2023
$45.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Cognitive deficits in depression have been associated with poor functional capacity, frontal neural circuit dysfunction, and worse response to conventional antidepressants. However, it is not known whether these impairments combine together to identify a specific cognitive subgroup (or "biotype") of individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD), and the extent to which these impairments mediate antidepressant outcomes. Objective: To undertake a systematic test of the validity of a proposed cognitive biotype of MDD across neural circuit, symptom, social occupational function, and treatment outcome modalities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial implemented data-driven clustering in findings from the International Study to Predict Optimized Treatment in Depression, a pragmatic biomarker trial in which patients with MDD were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to antidepressant treatment with escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine extended-release and assessed at baseline and 8 weeks on multimodal outcomes between December 1, 2008, and September 30, 2013. Eligible patients were medication-free outpatients with nonpsychotic MDD in at least the moderate range, and were recruited from 17 clinical and academic practices; a subset of these patients underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging. This prespecified secondary analysis was performed between June 10, 2022, and April 21, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pretreatment and posttreatment behavioral measures of cognitive performance across 9 domains, depression symptoms assessed using 2 standard depression scales, and psychosocial function assessed using the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale and World Health Organization Quality of Life scale were analyzed. Neural circuit function engaged during a cognitive control task was measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Results: A total of 1008 patients (571 [56.6%] female; mean [SD] age, 37.8 [12.6] years) participated in the overall trial and 96 patients participated in the imaging substudy (45 [46.7%] female; mean [SD] age, 34.5 [13.5] years). Cluster analysis identified what may be referred to as a cognitive biotype of 27% of depressed patients with prominent behavioral impairment in executive function and response inhibition domains of cognitive control. This biotype was characterized by a specific profile of pretreatment depressive symptoms, worse psychosocial functioning (d = -0.25; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.11; P < .001), and reduced activation of the cognitive control circuit (right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: d = -0.78; 95% CI, -1.28 to -0.27; P = .003). Remission was comparatively lower in the cognitive biotype positive subgroup (73 of 188 [38.8%] vs 250 of 524 [47.7%]; P = .04) and cognitive impairments persisted regardless of symptom change (executive function: ηp2 = 0.241; P < .001; response inhibition: ηp2 = 0.750; P < .001). The extent of symptom and functional change was specifically mediated by change in cognition but not the reverse. Conclusions and Relevance: Our findings suggest the presence of a cognitive biotype of depression with distinct neural correlates, and a functional clinical profile that responds poorly to standard antidepressants and instead may benefit from therapies specifically targeting cognitive dysfunction. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00693849.

Indexed as

CitalopramMajor Depressive DisorderAdultAntidepressive AgentsCognitionDepressionFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeAntidepressive AgentsCitalopram

Identifiers

PMID37318808
PMCPMC10273022
OpenAlexW4380730299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.