Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37318762›Full record

ArticleEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin2023

Post-exposure vaccine effectiveness and contact management in the mpox outbreak, Madrid, Spain, May to August 2022.

Laura Montero Morales, José Francisco Barbas Del Buey, Marcos Alonso García, Noelia Cenamor Largo, Alba Nieto Juliá, María C Vázquez Torres, Susana Jiménez Bueno, Andrés Aragón Peña, Elisa Gil Montalbán, Jesús Íñigo Martínez and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. A Review of Mpox Outbreak and Public Health Response in Spain.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura Montero MoralesDirectorate General of Public Health, Regional Ministry of Health of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
José Francisco Barbas Del BueyDirectorate General of Public Health, Regional Ministry of Health of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Marcos Alonso GarcíaDirectorate General of Public Health, Regional Ministry of Health of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Noelia Cenamor LargoDirectorate General of Public Health, Regional Ministry of Health of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Alba Nieto JuliáDirectorate General of Public Health, Regional Ministry of Health of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
María C Vázquez TorresDirectorate General of Public Health, Regional Ministry of Health of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Susana Jiménez BuenoDirectorate General of Public Health, Regional Ministry of Health of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Andrés Aragón PeñaDirectorate General of Public Health, Regional Ministry of Health of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Elisa Gil MontalbánDirectorate General of Public Health, Regional Ministry of Health of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jesús Íñigo MartínezDirectorate General of Public Health, Regional Ministry of Health of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
María Alonso ColónDirectorate General of Public Health, Regional Ministry of Health of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Araceli Arce ArnáezDirectorate General of Public Health, Regional Ministry of Health of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Madrid Surveillance Network and Vaccination Centre of Madrid RegionThe members of the networks are acknowledged at the end of the article.
Ministry of Health · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundAppropriate vaccination strategies have been key to controlling the outbreak of mpox outside endemic areas in 2022, yet few studies have provided information on mpox vaccine effectiveness (VE).AimTo assess VE after one dose of a third-generation smallpox vaccine against mpox when given as post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) within 14 days.MethodsA survival analysis in a prospective cohort of close contacts of laboratory-confirmed mpox cases was conducted from the beginning of the outbreak in the region of Madrid in May 2022. The study included contacts of cases in this region diagnosed between 17 May and 15 August 2022. Follow up was up to 49 days. A multivariate proportional hazard model was used to evaluate VE in the presence of confounding and interaction.ResultsInformation was obtained from 484 close contacts, of which 230 were vaccinated within 14 days of exposure. Of the close contacts, 57 became ill during follow-up, eight vaccinated and 49 unvaccinated. The adjusted effectiveness of the vaccine was 88.8% (95% CI: 76.0-94.7). Among sexual contacts, VE was 93.6% (95% CI: 72.1-98.5) for non-cohabitants and 88.6% (95% CI: 66.1-96.2) for cohabitants.ConclusionPost-exposure prophylaxis of close contacts of mpox cases is an effective measure that can contribute to reducing the number of cases and eventually the symptoms of breakthrough infections. The continued use of PEP together with pre-exposure prophylaxis by vaccination and other population-targeted prevention measures are key factors in controlling an mpox outbreak.

Indexed as

Mpox, MonkeypoxDisease OutbreaksHumansProspective StudiesSpainVaccine Efficacycontact tracingdisease outbreaksmpoxPost-Exposure Prophylaxissmallpox vaccinevaccine efficacy

Identifiers

PMID37318762
PMCPMC10318941
OpenAlexW4380730707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.