Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37318744›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2023

Gastrointestinal involvement in gallbladder cancer: Computed tomography findings and proposal of a classification system.

Raghuraman Soundararajan, Srivardhan Vanka, Pankaj Gupta, Manika Chhabra, Pratyaksha Rana, Ajay Gulati, Chandan K Das, Parikshaa Gupta, Uma Nahar Saikia, Thakur Deen Yadav and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multifocality in gallbladder cancer: An imaging-based study.Clinical and experimental hepatology · 2024
    Article
  2. Gallbladder cancer: Progress in the Indian subcontinent.World journal of clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raghuraman SoundararajanDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
Srivardhan VankaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
Pankaj GuptaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India. pankajgupta959@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3914-3757
Manika ChhabraDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
Pratyaksha RanaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
Ajay GulatiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
Chandan K DasDepartment of Clinical Hematology and Medical Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
Parikshaa GuptaDepartment of Cytology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
Uma Nahar SaikiaDepartment of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
Thakur Deen YadavDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
Vikas GuptaDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
Lileswar KamanDepartment General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
Harjeet SinghDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
Santosh IrrinkiDepartment General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
Usha DuttaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
Manavjit Singh SandhuDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160 012, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is relatively scarce data on the computed tomography (CT) detection of gastrointestinal (GI) involvement in gallbladder cancer (GBC). We aim to assess the GI involvement in GBC on CT and propose a CT-based classification.

methodsThis retrospective study comprized consecutive patients with GBC who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for staging between January 2019 and April 2022. Two radiologists evaluated the CT images independently for the morphological type of GBC and the presence of GI involvement. GI involvement was classified into probable involvement, definite involvement and GI fistulization. The incidence of GI involvement and the association of GI involvement with the morphological type of GBC was evaluated. In addition, the inter-observer agreement for GI involvement was assessed.

resultsOver the study period, 260 patients with GBC were evaluated. Forty-three (16.5%) patients had GI involvement. Probable GI involvement, definite GI involvement and GI fistulization were seen in 18 (41.9%), 19 (44.2%) and six (13.9%) patients, respectively. Duodenum was the most common site of involvement (55.8%), followed by hepatic flexure (23.3%), antropyloric region (9.3%) and transverse colon (2.3%). There was no association between GI involvement and morphological type of GBC. There was substantial to near-perfect agreement between the two radiologists for the overall GI involvement (k = 0.790), definite GI involvement (k = 0.815) and GI fistulization (k = 0.943). There was moderate agreement (k = 0.567) for probable GI involvement.

conclusionGBC frequently involves the GI tract and CT can be used to categorize the GI involvement. However, the proposed CT classification needs validation.

Indexed as

Gallbladder NeoplasmsDuodenumGastrointestinal TractHumansNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedCarcinomaClassificationComputed tomographyFistulizationGallbladder cancerGastrointestinal tractInter-observer agreementPrognosisStagingSurvival

Identifiers

PMID37318744
OpenAlexW4380730275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.