ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2023
Pan-cancer analysis of cuproptosis-promoting gene signature from multiple perspectives.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Copper homeostasis and cuproptosis in cancer: mitochondrial metabolic dependency and nanomedicine-based therapeutic strategies.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Review
- The molecular mechanism and therapeutic landscape of copper and cuproptosis in cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Cuproptosis: Mechanism and Application in Lymphoma.Current cancer drug targets · 2025Review
- Construction of a novel cuproptosis-related gene signature for predicting microenvironment, prognosis and therapeutic response in cervical cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Cuproptosis, the novel type of oxidation-induced cell death in thoracic cancers: can it enhance the success of immunotherapy?Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cuproptosis is a newly discovered cell death form with a unique mechanism. Seven genes have been identified to facilitate the process. To explore the roles of cuproptosis in different cancers, we first used Gene Expression Profiling, Interactive Analysis, version 2, and cBioPortal to analyze expression, prognosis and mutation conditions in different cancers from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Then, we conducted single sample gene set enrichment analysis to combine the signature of the cuproptosis-promoting genes for all TCGA cancers. Moreover, we performed a survival analysis to explore if cuproptosis-score could independently influence clinical outcomes. Next, we compared pathway enrichment, immune infiltration, gene set activity and gene mutation between different cuproptosis-score groups. Finally, based on the intersected genes from difference analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis, consensus clustering and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator Cox regression were performed and nomograms were constructed. Cuproptosis-score was associated with a favorable prognosis in eight TCGA cancers. Cancer-associated fibroblasts, B cells, neutrophils and mast cells were generally less abundant, and ferroptosis activity was higher in high cuproptosis-score groups. The novel classifications could differentiate patients' overall survival, and the risk models could effectively predict patients' outcomes in kidney, renal clear cell carcinoma, liver hepatocellular carcinoma, mesothelioma and stomach adenocarcinoma. Cuproptosis activity was closely related to the prognosis of several cancers. Its effects on the immune microenvironment and its relationship with other cell death modes, especially ferroptosis, may become the focus of further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37318649What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.