ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2023
Prediction of HER2 status via random forest in 3257 Chinese patients with gastric cancer.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence for the prediction of prognosis in colorectal cancer patients using routine blood indices.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Low atherogenic index of plasma is associated with spontaneous hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke patients: a retrospective cohort study and predictive modeling based on machine learning.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- Screening of gastric cancer diagnostic biomarkers in the homologous recombination signaling pathway and assessment of their clinical and radiomic correlations.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- GATIS score for predicting the prognosis of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: A Chinese multicenter study of 12-year experience.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Comparative assessment of the capability of machine learning-based radiomic models for predicting omental metastasis in locally advanced gastric cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is crucial for successful trastuzumab-based therapy in individuals with gastric cancer (GC). The present study, involving a retrospective cohort (N = 2865) from Wuhan Union Hospital and a prospective cohort (N = 392) from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, evaluated the benefits of clinical features using random forest and logistic regression models for the detection of HER2 status in patients with GC. Patients from the Union cohort were randomly assigned to either a training (N = 2005) or an internal validation (N = 860) group. Data processing and feature selection were done in Python, which was also used to build random forest and logistic regression models for the prediction of HER2 overexpression. The Renmin cohort (N = 392) was used as the external validation group. Ten features were closely correlated with HER2 overexpression, including age, albumin/globulin ratio, globulin, activated partial thromboplastin time, tumor stage, node stage, tumor node metastasis stage, tumor size, tumor differentiation, and neuron-specific enolase (NSE). Random forest and logistic regression had areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.9995 and 0.6653 in the training group and 0.923 and 0.667 in the internal validation group, respectively. When the two predictive models were validated using data from the Renmin cohort, random forest and logistic regression had AUCs of 0.9994 and 0.627, respectively. This is the first multicenter study to predict HER2 overexpression in individuals with GC, based on clinical variables. The random forest model significantly outperformed the logistic regression model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.