Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37318605›Full record

Observational studyEuropean radiology2023

Exploring the added value of pretherapeutic MR descriptors in predicting breast cancer pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Caroline Malhaire, Fatine Selhane, Marie-Judith Saint-Martin, Vincent Cockenpot, Pia Akl, Enora Laas, Audrey Bellesoeur, Catherine Ala Eddine, Melodie Bereby-Kahane, Julie Manceau and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline MalhaireDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France. caroline.malhaire@curie.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9235-9816
Fatine SelhaneGustave Roussy, Department of Imaging, Paris-Saclay University, 94805, Villejuif, France.
Marie-Judith Saint-MartinInstitut Curie, Research Center, U1288-LITO, Inserm, Paris-Saclay University, 91401, Orsay, France.
Vincent CockenpotPathology Unit, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Rue Laennec, 69008, Lyon, France.
Pia AklWomen Imaging Unit, HCL, Radiologie du Groupement Hospitalier Est, 3 Quai Des Célestins, 69002, Lyon, France.
Enora LaasDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
Audrey BellesoeurDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
Catherine Ala EddineDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
Melodie Bereby-KahaneDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
Julie ManceauDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
Delphine Sebbag-SfezDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
Jean-Yves PiergaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
Fabien ReyalDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
Anne Vincent-SalomonDepartment of Pathology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
Herve BrisseDepartment of Medical Imaging, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France.
Frederique FrouinInstitut Curie, Research Center, U1288-LITO, Inserm, Paris-Saclay University, 91401, Orsay, France.
Institut Curie · FRUniversité Paris Sciences et Lettres · FRInserm · FRCentre Léon Bérard · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the association between pretreatment MRI descriptors and breast cancer (BC) pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with BC treated by NAC with a breast MRI between 2016 and 2020 were included in this retrospective observational single-center study. MR studies were described using the standardized BI-RADS and breast edema score on T2-weighted MRI. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess variables association with pCR according to residual cancer burden. Random forest classifiers were trained to predict pCR on a random split including 70% of the database and were validated on the remaining cases.

resultsAmong 129 BC, 59 (46%) achieved pCR after NAC (luminal (n = 7/37, 19%), triple negative (n = 30/55, 55%), HER2 + (n = 22/37, 59%)). Clinical and biological items associated with pCR were BC subtype (p < 0.001), T stage 0/I/II (p = 0.008), higher Ki67 (p = 0.005), and higher tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes levels (p = 0.016). Univariate analysis showed that the following MRI features, oval or round shape (p = 0.047), unifocality (p = 0.026), non-spiculated margins (p = 0.018), no associated non-mass enhancement (p = 0.024), and a lower MRI size (p = 0.031), were significantly associated with pCR. Unifocality and non-spiculated margins remained independently associated with pCR at multivariable analysis. Adding significant MRI features to clinicobiological variables in random forest classifiers significantly increased sensitivity (0.67 versus 0.62), specificity (0.69 versus 0.67), and precision (0.71 versus 0.67) for pCR prediction.

conclusionNon-spiculated margins and unifocality are independently associated with pCR and can increase models performance to predict BC response to NAC. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A multimodal approach integrating pretreatment MRI features with clinicobiological predictors, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, could be employed to develop machine learning models for identifying patients at risk of non-response. This may enable consideration of alternative therapeutic strategies to optimize treatment outcomes. KEY POINTS: • Unifocality and non-spiculated margins are independently associated with pCR at multivariable logistic regression analysis. • Breast edema score is associated with MR tumor size and TIL expression, not only in TN BC as previously reported, but also in luminal BC. • Adding significant MRI features to clinicobiological variables in machine learning classifiers significantly increased sensitivity, specificity, and precision for pCR prediction.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEdemaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBreast neoplasmsMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant therapyNeoplasm, residualTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID37318605
OpenAlexW4380674903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.