Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37318575›Full record

ArticleAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2023

Controversies in the Treatment of Arachnoid Cysts with Special Emphasis on Temporal Arachnoid Cysts.

Aurelia Peraud, Rebecca Ibel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aurelia PeraudSection Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany. aurelia.peraud@uniklinik-ulm.de.
Rebecca IbelSection Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
University Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial arachnoid cysts (ACs) are benign lesions. The incidence in children is 2.6%. ACs are often diagnosed incidentally. Because of the broad use of CT and MR imaging, the frequency of AC diagnosis has increased. In addition, prenatal diagnosis of ACs is becoming more common. This places clinicians in a difficult situation with regard to the optimal treatment, since the presenting symptoms are often vague and operative management includes not negligible risks. It is generally accepted that conservative management is indicated in cases with small and asymptomatic cysts. In contrast, patients with definite signs of raised intracranial pressure should be treated. There are however clinical situations in whom the decision about the preferred treatment is difficult to make. Unspecific symptoms such as headaches and neurocognitive or attention deficits can be challenging to evaluate, whether they are related to the presence of the AC or not. The treatment techniques intent to establish a communication between the cyst and the normal cerebrospinal spaces or consist of a diversion of the cyst fluid by a shunt system. Which surgical method (open craniotomy for cyst fenestration, endoscopic fenestration, or shunting) is preferred differs between neurosurgical centers or the pediatric neurosurgeon in charge. Each treatment option has a unique profile of advantages and disadvantages which should be considered when discussing treatment with the patients or their caregivers.

Indexed as

Arachnoid CystsChildCraniotomyEndoscopyHeadacheHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeurosurgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeArachnoid cystClinical outcomeComplicationCystoperitoneal shuntEndoscopyMicrosurgical fenestrationMiddle cranial fossa

Identifiers

PMID37318575
OpenAlexW4380730112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.