Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37318573›Full record

ArticleAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2023

Evolving Concepts of Craniovertebral and Spinal Instability.

Atul Goel, Ravikiran Vutha, Abhidha Shah

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Atul GoelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lilavati Hospital and Research Center, Mumbai, India.
Ravikiran VuthaK.J.Somaiya Medical College and Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Abhidha ShahSeth G.S. Medical College and K.E.M Hospital, Mumbai, India.
K J Somaiya Medical College · INLilavati Hospital & Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weakness of the muscles of the nape of the neck and back of the spine and its related instability is the nodal point of pathogenesis of a number of clinical and pathological events at the craniovertebral junction and the spine. Whilst acute instability results in sudden and relatively severe symptoms, chronic or long-standing instability is associated with a range of musculoskeletal and structural spinal alterations. Telescoping of the spinal segments results in "vertical" spinal instability in the subaxial spine and central or axial atlantoaxial instability (CAAD) at the craniovertebral junction. Instability in such cases might not be observed on dynamic radiological imaging. Chiari formation, basilar invagination, syringomyelia, and Klippel-Feil alteration are some of the secondary alterations as a result of chronic atlantoaxial instability. Radiculopathy/myelopathy related to spinal degeneration or ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament appears to have their origin from vertical spinal instability. All the secondary alterations in the craniovertebral junction and subaxial spine that are traditionally considered pathological and to have compressive and deforming role are essentially protective in nature, are indicative of instability, and are potentially reversible following atlantoaxial stabilization. Stabilization of unstable spinal segments is the basis of surgical treatment.

Indexed as

Atlanto-Axial JointJoint InstabilityKlippel-Feil SyndromeSpinal DiseasesSyringomyeliaCervical VertebraeHumansCentral atlantoaxial instabilityCervical spondylosisSpinal degenerationVertical spinal instability

Identifiers

PMID37318573
OpenAlexW4380682111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.