Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37318569›Full record

ArticleAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2023

Supracerebellar Infratentorial Approach, Indications, and Technical Pitfalls.

Alican Tahta, Nejat Akalan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alican TahtaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nejat AkalanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul Medipol University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Posterior tentorial incisura not infrequently requires to be exposed for tumors of pineal gland, pulvinar, midbrain and cerebellum, aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations. Residing almost at the center of the brain, this area is almost equal distance to any point on the calvarium behind coronal sutures enabling alternative routes to encounter. Compared to supratentorial routes either subtemporal or suboccipital approach, infratentorial supracerebellar route has several advantages as providing shortest, most direct approach to the lesions of this area without encountering any important arteries and veins. Since its initial description at the early twentieth century, a wide range of complications arising from cerebellar infarction, air embolism, and neural tissue damage have been encountered. Working in a deep, narrow corridor without enough illumination and visibility under very limited anesthesiology support hindered popularization of this approach. In the contemporary era of neurosurgery, advanced diagnostic tools and surgical microscopes with state-of-the-art microsurgery techniques coupled with modern anesthesiology have eliminated almost all drawbacks of infratentorial supracerebellar approach.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsPineal GlandPinealomaHumansNeurosurgical ProceduresVeinsCranial approachInfratentorial superior cerebellar approachPineal regionPosterior tentorial incisura

Identifiers

PMID37318569
OpenAlexW4380729949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.