ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[Digitalization in rehabilitation].
Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Digital rehabilitation methods in orthopaedics-Current status, evidence, and perspectives].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- User acceptance of telerehabilitation in Germany: a structural equation modeling approach based on the UTAUT2 model.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Investigating the Acceptance and Implementation Conditions of Telerehabilitation in Germany Among Patients and Health Care Professionals: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2025Article
- [Status and implementation conditions of digitally supported services in medical rehabilitation].Die Rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Factors Facilitating and Inhibiting the Implementation of Telerehabilitation-A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe term digitalization is in trend. In addition to modernizing existing structures and converting analogue to digital processes, there are now a large number of digital applications available in the medical field. This is also increasingly influencing prehabilitation and rehabilitation.
objectiveThe aim of this article is to provide an overview of digitalization options in the field of rehabilitation, taking the current literature into account. MATERIAL AND
methodsA systematic literature search was carried out on the topic of digitalization in rehabilitation, especially in relation to interventions and diseases of the knee joint, using among others PubMed and PEDro. RESULTS AND
conclusionHaving arrived in "Rehabilitation 4.0", the networking of all infrastructures as well as the increasing use of artificial intelligence, the individualization of offers for healthcare companies and patients are playing an increasing role and are experiencing a real hype due to the supposedly infinite possibilities; however, the data situation on various digital offers in rehabilitation is inconsistent. The digital transformation provides many opportunities and challenges for rehabilitation, but despite all the euphoria it has to be critically questioned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.