ArticleJACC. Heart failure2023
Pulmonary Artery Catheter Use and Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.
Article in JACC. Heart failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07062744 (The Role of Swan-Ganz Catheter in Hemodynamic Resuscitation for Patients With Cardiogenic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Role of Swan-Ganz Catheter in Hemodynamic Resuscitation for Patients With Cardiogenic Shock
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- ESICM guidelines on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring 2025.Intensive care medicine · 2025Guideline
- Early Lower Pulmonary Arterial Diastolic Pressure Monitored With Pulmonary Arterial Catheters Is Associated With Improved Survival During VA ECMO for Patients With Acute Cardiogenic Shock: A Propensity-Matched Study.JACC. Heart failure · 2026Article
- Beyond Blood Pressure: The Role of Flow Parameters and Biomarkers of Hypoperfusion in Cardiogenic Shock.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Disparities in the management of cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: a questionnaire survey in Beijing.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Evolving Evidence-Driven Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock Management.JACC. Advances · 2026Review
- Variation in Vasoactive Treatment Selection for Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN).Circulation. Heart failure · 2026Article
- Right Heart Catheterization: Best Practices and Specific Considerations.International journal of heart failure · 2026Review
- Lung and Venous Excess Ultrasound Correlation With Intracardiac Pressures Before and After Decongestion in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.Critical care explorations · 2026Observational
- Extracorporeal Cytokine Adsorption in Acute Cardiovascular Care: Pathophysiological Insights and Clinical Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Predicting 7-Day Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults with cardiogenic shock.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Cardiogenic Shock Systems of Care Best Practices. Part 1: Prehospital and Emergency Department Evaluation and Management.US cardiology · 2026Review
- Invasive hemodynamic monitoring-guided resuscitation improves survival in shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
- Cardiogenic Shock Systems of Care Best Practices. Part 2: The Shock Team and Inpatient Management.US cardiology · 2026Review
- A Discrete Hemodynamic Control System: Proof-of-Concept In-Vivo Study in Canine Heart Failure Using a Pulmonary Artery Catheter.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- A Proposed Algorithm for the Management of Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Based on Contemporary Knowledge and Gaps in Evidence.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Special topics: heart failure-related cardiogenic shock, valvular heart disease and end-stage renal disease. Part 4 of the International Expert Opinion Series on Acute Heart Failure Management.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Association Between Pressure-Adjusted Heart Rate and In-Hospital Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock.JACC. Advances · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular Physiology During Mechanical Circulatory Support: Implications for Management and Monitoring.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Admitted in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit with Cardiogenic Shock: A Single-Center Study.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
41 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe appropriate use of pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) in critically ill cardiac patients remains debated.
objectivesThe authors aimed to characterize the current use of PACs in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) with attention to patient-level and institutional factors influencing their application and explore the association with in-hospital mortality.
methodsThe Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is a multicenter network of CICUs in North America. Between 2017 and 2021, participating centers contributed annual 2-month snapshots of consecutive CICU admissions. Admission diagnoses, clinical and demographic data, use of PACs, and in-hospital mortality were captured.
resultsAmong 13,618 admissions at 34 sites, 3,827 were diagnosed with shock, with 2,583 of cardiogenic etiology. The use of mechanical circulatory support and heart failure were the patient-level factors most strongly associated with a greater likelihood of the use of a PAC (OR: 5.99 [95% CI: 5.15-6.98]; P < 0.001 and OR: 3.33 [95% CI: 2.91-3.81]; P < 0.001, respectively). The proportion of shock admissions with a PAC varied significantly by study center ranging from 8% to 73%. In analyses adjusted for factors associated with their placement, PAC use was associated with lower mortality in all shock patients admitted to a CICU (OR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.66-0.96]; P = 0.017).
conclusionsThere is wide variation in the use of PACs that is not fully explained by patient level-factors and appears driven in part by institutional tendency. PAC use was associated with higher survival in cardiac patients with shock presenting to CICUs. Randomized trials are needed to guide the appropriate use of PACs in cardiac critical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.