Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37318363›Full record

Trial reportInflammatory bowel diseases2024

Controlled Hookworm Infection for Medication-free Maintenance in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: A Pilot, Double-blind, Randomized Control Trial.

Thomas C Mules, Brittany Lavender, Kate Maclean, Francesco Vacca, Sophia-Louise Noble, Bibek Yumnam, Tama Te Kawa, Alissa Cait, Jeffry Tang, David O'Sullivan and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas C MulesMalaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3943-9198
Brittany LavenderMalaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
Kate MacleanMalaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
Francesco VaccaMalaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
Sophia-Louise NobleMalaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
Bibek YumnamMalaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
Tama Te KawaMalaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
Alissa CaitMalaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
Jeffry TangMalaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
David O'SullivanMalaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
Olivier GasserMalaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
James StanleyBiostatistics Group, Otago University, Wellington, New Zealand.
Graham Le GrosMalaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
Mali CamberisMalaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
Stephen InnsMalaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand.
Malaghan Institute of Medical Research · NZUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

Health Research Council of New Zealand
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman hookworm has been proposed as a treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). This pilot study assessed the feasibility of a full-scale randomized control trial examining hookworm to maintain clinical remission in patients with UC.

methodsTwenty patients with UC in disease remission (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index [SCCAI] ≤4 and fecal calprotectin (fCal) <100 ug/g) and only on 5-aminosalicylate received 30 hookworm larvae or placebo. Participants stopped 5-aminosalicylate after 12 weeks. Participants were monitored for up to 52 weeks and exited the study if they had a UC flare (SCCAI ≥5 and fCal ≥200 µg/g). The primary outcome was difference in rates of clinical remission at week 52. Differences were assessed for quality of life (QoL) and feasibility aspects including recruitment, safety, effectiveness of blinding, and viability of the hookworm infection.

resultsAt 52 weeks, 4 of 10 (40%) participants in the hookworm group and 5 of 10 (50%) participants in the placebo group had maintained clinical remission (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.11-3.92). Median time to flare in the hookworm group was 231 days (interquartile range [IQR], 98-365) and 259 days for placebo (IQR, 132-365). Blinding was quite successful in the placebo group (Bang's blinding index 0.22; 95% CI, -0.21 to 1) but less successful in the hookworm group (0.70; 95% CI, 0.37-1.0). Almost all participants in the hookworm group had detectable eggs in their faeces (90%; 95% CI, 0.60-0.98), and all participants in this group developed eosinophilia (peak eosinophilia 4.35 × 10^9/L; IQR, 2.80-6.68). Adverse events experienced were generally mild, and there was no significant difference in QoL.

conclusionsA full-scale randomized control trial examining hookworm therapy as a maintenance treatment in patients with UC appears feasible.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeFecesHookworm InfectionsMesalamineQuality of LifeRemission InductionAdultAnimalsDouble-Blind MethodFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexMesalamineclinical trialhelminthhookworminflammatory bowel diseaseulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID37318363
PMCPMC11063543
OpenAlexW4380730376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.