ArticleBalkan medical journal2023
Comparison of Different
Article in Balkan medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of ROS1 Gene Rearrangement in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Concordance Between ROS1 SP384 Immunohistochemistry and ROS1 FISH Assay in a Single Center in Türkiye.Turk patoloji dergisi · 2026Article
- Quantitative Analysis of CD27/CD70 Protein Expression and Investigation of Related Mechanisms in the Tumor Microenvironment of NSCLC.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The study of Aims: To investigate the effectiveness of the commonly used two IHC antibodies (SP384 and D4D6 clones) to detect Study Design: A retrospective cohort study. Methods: The study included 103 samples diagnosed with NSCLC, confirmed using IHC and FISH Results: The sensitivity of SP384 and D4D6 clones of Conclusion: Our findings show that the SP384 clone is more sensitive than D4D6. However, SP384 can also cause false positive results like D4D6. Knowing the variable diagnostic performance of different
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.