Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37317690›Full record

ReviewNature reviews bioengineering2023

Plant-based biopharmaceutical engineering.

Lukas Eidenberger, Benjamin Kogelmann, Herta Steinkellner

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews bioengineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
33.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Plant-Based Systems for Producing Therapeutic Proteins: Current Status and Future Prospects.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The Nicotiana benthamiana Biofactory.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lukas Eidenberger *Department of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9491-1416
Benjamin Kogelmann *Department of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4796-6315
Herta SteinkellnerDepartment of Applied Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4823-1505
BOKU University · ATAustrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology (Austria) · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 4328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants can be engineered to recombinantly produce high-quality proteins such as therapeutic proteins and vaccines, also known as molecular farming. Molecular farming can be established in various settings with minimal cold-chain requirements and could thus ensure rapid and global-scale deployment of biopharmaceuticals, promoting equitable access to pharmaceuticals. State of the art plant-based engineering relies on rationally assembled genetic circuits, engineered to enable the high-throughput and rapid expression of multimeric proteins with complex post-translational modifications. In this Review, we discuss the design of expression hosts and vectors, including

Indexed as

GlycosylationMolecular engineering in plantsPlant molecular biology

Identifiers

PMID37317690
PMCPMC10030082
OpenAlexW4328052255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.