ArticleMicroorganisms2023
Metagenomic Sequencing of Positive Blood Culture Fluid for Accurate Bacterial and Fungal Species Identification: A Pilot Study.
Article in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Re-incubation of positive anaerobic blood culture bottles for detecting additional anaerobes in polymicrobial bacteremia.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Observational
- Rapid Microbiological Diagnostics for Sepsis: Narrative Review of Current and Prospective Approaches.Critical care explorations · 2026Review
- Evaluating long-read metagenomics for bloodstream infection diagnostics: a pilot study from a Thai Tertiary Hospital.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Treatment outcomes among patients with mycobacterial blood stream infection in a tertiary hospital:a retrospective study form 2019 to 2023.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing for Bloodstream Infections: Shaping the Future of Rapid Diagnostics and Precision Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the taxonomic classification tools and visualizers for metagenomic analysis using the Oxford nanopore sequence database.Journal of applied genetics · 2025Article
- Academic and clinical perspectives of metagenome sequencing as a diagnostic tool for infectious disease: an interpretive phenomenological study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- The role of fungi in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer.Mycology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With blood stream infections (BSIs) representing a major cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, blood cultures play a crucial role in diagnosis, but their clinical application is dampened by the long turn-around time and the detection of only culturable pathogens. In this study, we developed and validated a shotgun metagenomics next-generation sequencing (mNGS) test directly from positive blood culture fluid, allowing for the identification of fastidious or slow growing microorganisms more rapidly. The test was built based on previously validated next-generation sequencing tests, which rely on several key marker genes for bacterial and fungal identification. The new test utilizes an open-source metagenomics CZ-ID platform for the initial analysis to generate the most likely candidate species, which is then used as a reference genome for downstream, confirmatory analysis. This approach is innovative because it takes advantage of an open-source software's agnostic taxonomic calling capability while still relying on the more established and previously validated marker gene-based identification scheme, increasing the confidence in the final results. The test showed high accuracy (100%, 30/30) for both bacterial and fungal microorganisms. We further demonstrated its clinical utility especially for anaerobes and mycobacteria that are either fastidious, slow growing, or unusual. Although applicable in only limited settings, the Positive Blood Culture mNGS test provides an incremental improvement in solving the unmet clinical needs for the diagnosis of challenging BSIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.