Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37317087›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2023

Response of Sagebrush Steppe Grass Species to AMF Inoculum Sources and Biochar.

David Eduardo Prado-Tarango, Ricardo Mata-González, Matthew Hovland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David Eduardo Prado-TarangoDepartment of Animal and Rangeland Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2685-527X
Ricardo Mata-GonzálezDepartment of Animal and Rangeland Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Matthew HovlandDepartment of Animal and Rangeland Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.

Funding

Bureau of Land Management L20AC00115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sagebrush steppe has presented increasing levels of degradation. The addition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and biochar have been suggested to restore ecosystems. However, little is known about their effects on sagebrush steppe plants. We tested three sources of AMF inoculum: soil from a disturbed site (Inoculum A), soil from an undisturbed site (Inoculum B), and commercial inoculum (Inoculum C), all with and without biochar, to test if they could mediate growth of

Indexed as

Artemisiainoculationinvasive speciesmedusaheadmycorrhizarangelandsrestoration

Identifiers

PMID37317087
PMCPMC10222923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.