ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2023
Comparison of the femoral condylar ellipse line and the surgical epicondylar axis: 3D measurement by MRI scans in healthy Chinese people.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Computed Tomography in Achieving True External Rotation in Robotic Knee Replacement: A Retrospective Analysis of 300 Knees.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
- Optimal angles for independent femoral tunnel drillings to prevent damage to anatomic structures in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe sagittal shapes of the femoral condyles were thought to consist of circles. However, the line connecting the centers of circles was not consistent with the surgical epicondylar axis (SEA) which was commonly used in surgery. Recently, ellipses have been proposed as an alternative method to represent the sagittal femoral condylar shape. Does the condylar ellipse line (CEL) coincide with the SEA in 3D MRI reconstruction analysis?
methodsFrom May to August 2021, a total of 80 healthy subjects were scanned by MRI on the right knee in this retrospective study. The ellipses on the most distal slices of the medial and lateral condyles were determined. A line connecting the centers of the medial and lateral ellipses was the CEL. A line connecting the deepest point of the medial sulcus and the most prominent point of the lateral epicondyle was the SEA. Angular measurement of the SEA and the CEL relative to the posterior condylar line (PCL) and the distal condylar line (DCL) was performed on an axial and coronal view of the 3D model, respectively. Measurements were compared between males and females by using the independent-samples t-test. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the relationship between SEA-PCL and CEL-PCL, SEA-DCL, and CEL-DCL.
resultsOn the axial view, the mean SEA-CEL was 0.35° ± 0.96°. SEA-PCL (2.91° ± 1.40°) had a high correlation with CEL-PCL (3.27° ± 1.11°) (r = 0.731, p < 0.001). On the coronal view, the mean coronal SEA-CEL was 1.35° ± 1.13°. SEA-DCL (1.35° ± 1.13°) had a low correlation with CEL-DCL (0.18° ± 0.84°) (r = 0.319, p = 0.007). On the sagittal view, the outlet points of the CEL on the medial and lateral epicondyles were anatomically located in the anteroinferior direction to the SEA.
conclusionsCEL traversed the medial and lateral epicondyles, which has a mean deviation of 0.35° with SEA on axial view and a mean deviation of 0.18° with DCL on coronal view. This study suggested that the ellipse approach is an improved scheme for representing the femoral condylar shape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.