Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37317011›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

Facilitators and inhibitors of traumatic brain injury transfers: A fieldwork investigation.

Karin Højbjerg, Ingrid Poulsen, Ingrid Egerod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karin HøjbjergDepartment of Learning and Philosophy, Aalborg University Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ingrid PoulsenDepartment of Brain Injury, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ingrid EgerodDepartment of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9576-4390

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIntensified healthcare specialization has increased the need for patient transfers. We aimed to describe in-hospital and interhospital patient transfer decisions during the traumatic brain injury (TBI) trajectory from a nursing perspective.

designEthnographic fieldwork.

methodsWe used participant observation and interviews at three sites representing the acute, subacute and stable stages of the TBI trajectory. Deductive analysis was applied supported by transition theory.

resultsDuring the acute stage (neurointensive care), transfer decisions were facilitated by physicians assisted by critical care nurses, in the subacute stage (highly specialized rehabilitation), transfer decisions were collaborative among in-house healthcare professionals, community staff and family, and during the stable stage (municipal rehabilitation), transfer decisions were made by non-clinical staff. Most of the resources allocated during the trajectory went towards highly specialized rehabilitation, whereas more resources are needed during the end of the trajectory. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients and the public were not involved in this study .

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHospitalsHumansPatient Transferdecision-makinghealth transitionsnursingpatient transferqualitative researchtraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID37317011
PMCPMC10416057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.