ReviewEar and hearing
Using Complex Networks in the Hearing Sciences.
Review in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this Point of View, we review a number of recent discoveries from the emerging, interdisciplinary field of Network Science , which uses graph theoretic techniques to understand complex systems. In the network science approach, nodes represent entities in a system, and connections are placed between nodes that are related to each other to form a web-like network . We discuss several studies that demonstrate how the micro-, meso-, and macro-level structure of a network of phonological word-forms influence spoken word recognition in listeners with normal hearing and in listeners with hearing loss. Given the discoveries made possible by this new approach and the influence of several complex network measures on spoken word recognition performance we argue that speech recognition measures-originally developed in the late 1940s and routinely used in clinical audiometry-should be revised to reflect our current understanding of spoken word recognition. We also discuss other ways in which the tools of network science can be used in Speech and Hearing Sciences and Audiology more broadly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.