Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37316881›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2023

The complexities of integrating evidence-based preventative health into England's NHS: lessons learnt from the case of PrEP.

Tehseen Khan, Clare Coultas, Katharina Kieslich, Peter Littlejohns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. From structures to systems: towards a model of ethical healthcare.Health systems (Basingstoke, England) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tehseen KhanKing's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Clare CoultasKing's College London, London, United Kingdom. clare.coultas@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8506-8287
Katharina KieslichDepartment of Political Science, University of Vienna, Universitätsstr. 7, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
Peter LittlejohnsKing's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe integration of preventative health services into England's National Health Service is one of the cornerstones of current health policy. This integration is primarily envisaged through the removal of legislation that blocks collaborations between NHS organisations, local government, and community groups. AIMS AND

objectivesThis paper aims to illustrate why these actions are insufficient through the case study of the PrEP judicial review.

methodsThrough an interview study with 15 HIV experts (commissioners, activists, clinicians, and national health body representatives), we explore the means by which the HIV prevention agenda was actively blocked, when NHS England denied responsibility for funding the clinically effective HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) drug in 2016, a case that led to judicial review. We draw on Wu et al.'s (Policy Soc 34:165-171, 2016) conceptual framing of 'policy capacity' in undertaking this analysis.

resultsThe analyses highlight three main barriers to collaborating around evidence-based preventative health which indicate three main competence/capability issues in regard to policy capacity: latent stigma of 'lifestyle conditions' (individual-analytical capacity); the invisibility of prevention in the fragmented health and social care landscape related to issues of evidence generation and sharing, and public mobilisation (organizational-operational capacity); and institutional politics and distrust (systemic-political capacity). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionWe suggest that the findings hold implications for other 'lifestyle' conditions that are tackled through interventions funded by multiple healthcare bodies. We extend the discussion beyond the 'policy capacity and capabilities' approach to connect with a wider range of insights from the policy sciences, aimed at considering the range of actions needed for limiting the potential of commissioners to 'pass the buck' in regard to evidence-based preventative health.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsState MedicineEnglandHealth PolicyHumansLearningEvidence-based policyHIVNHS commissioningPrEPPreventative health

Identifiers

PMID37316881
PMCPMC10265874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.