Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37316844›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

'But what if you miss something …?': factors that influence medical student consideration of cost in decision making.

Emmanuel Tan, Wei Ming Ng, Poh Choong Soh, Daniel Tan, Jennifer Cleland

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanuel TanLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. emmanuel_tan@ntu.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0204-0079
Wei Ming NgDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9600-4716
Poh Choong SohDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Daniel TanLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Jennifer ClelandLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1433-9323
Nanyang Technological University · SGNg Teng Fong General Hospital · SG

Funding

Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine's Medical Education Research and Scholarship Unit (MERSU) 03INP001104A630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextCost-conscious care is critical for healthcare sustainability but evidence suggests that most doctors do not consider cost in their clinical decision making. A critical step in changing this is understanding the barriers to encouraging behaviours and attitudes related to cost-conscious care. We therefore conducted a qualitative study to address the research question: what factors influence consideration of cost in emergency medicine (ED) clinical decision making?

methodsThis was a qualitative focus group study using patient vignettes to explore attitudes towards cost-conscious clinical decision making. Participants were Year 4 and Year 5 medical students from Singapore, a country with a fee-for-service healthcare system. After a data-driven initial data analysis, and to make sense of a multitude of factors impacting on cost conscious care, we selected Fishbein's integrative model of behavioural prediction to underpin secondary data analysis.

resultsVia four focus groups with 21 participants, we identified five main themes relevant to the integrative model of behavioural prediction. These were: attitudes towards considering cost when managing a patient (e.g., "better safe than sorry"); normative beliefs (e.g., doing what others do, perceptions of patient wishes); efficacy beliefs (e.g., no authority to take decisions or challenge); skills and knowledge (e.g., little knowledge of costs), and environmental constraints (e.g., the nature of the healthcare system). DISCUSSION: Medical students do not consider cost in their clinical decision making due to numerous factors, of which lack of knowledge of costs is but one. While some of the factors identified reflect those found in previous studies with residents and fully-trained staff, and in other contexts, theory driven analysis added value in that it facilitated a richer exploration of why students do not consider cost in clinical decision making. Our findings provide insight to inform how best to engage and empower educators and learners in teaching and learning about cost-conscious care.

Indexed as

Emergency MedicineStudents, MedicalClinical Decision-MakingData AnalysisDecision MakingHumansCostCost-conscious careDecision makingEmergency departmentMedical students

Identifiers

PMID37316844
PMCPMC10268427
OpenAlexW4380627336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.