ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2023
Comparison of aortic stiffness and hypertension in repaired coarctation patients with a bicuspid versus a tricuspid aortic valve.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stress Echocardiography in the Follow-Up of Young Patients with Repaired Aortic Coarctation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Aortic arch shape after arch repair predicts exercise capacity: a multicentre analysis.European heart journal open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoarctation of the aorta (COA) is associated with reduced aortic distensibility and systemic hypertension (HTN). 60-85% of COA patients have a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). It is not known if the presence of a BAV accentuates the aortopathy and HTN in CoA patients. We examined whether patients with COA and a BAV had lower aortic distensibility by CMR, and a higher prevalence of systemic HTN compared with COA patients with a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV).
methodsIn successfully repaired COA patients excluding those with residual COA, ascending aorta (AAO) and descending aorta (DAO) distensibility was calculated by CMR. HTN was assessed using standard pediatric and adult criteria.
resultsAmong 215 COA patients (median age 25.3 years), 67% had a BAV, and 33% had a TAV. Median AAO distensibility z-score was lower in the BAV group (- 1.2 versus - 0.7; p = 0.014) but DAO distensibility was similar in BAV and TAV patients. HTN prevalence was similar in BAV (32%) and TAV groups (36%, p = 0.56). On multivariable analysis controlling for confounders, HTN was not associated with BAV but was associated with male gender (p = 0.003) and older age at follow-up (p = 0.004).
conclusionsIn young adults with treated COA, those with a BAV had stiffer AAO compared to those with a TAV, but DAO stiffness was similar. HTN was not related to BAV. These results suggest that although the presence of a BAV in COA exacerbates the AAO aortopathy, it does not exacerbate the more generalized vascular dysfunction and associated HTN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.