Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37316822›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

Implementing a cirrhosis order set in a tertiary healthcare system: a theory-informed formative evaluation.

A M Hyde, E Johnson, T Luig, D Schroeder, M Carbonneau, D Campbell-Scherer, P Tandon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A M HydeDivision of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, 8540 112 St NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P8, Canada.
E JohnsonDivision of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, 8540 112 St NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P8, Canada.
T LuigPhysician Learning Program, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
D SchroederPhysician Learning Program, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
M CarbonneauAlberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada.
D Campbell-Scherer *Physician Learning Program, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. denise.campbell-scherer@ualberta.ca.
P Tandon *Division of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, 8540 112 St NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P8, Canada. ptandon@ualberta.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStandardized order sets are a means of increasing adherence to clinical practice guidelines and improving the quality of patient care. Implementation of novel quality improvement initiatives like order sets can be challenging. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a formative evaluation to understand healthcare providers' perspectives on implementing clinical changes and the individual, collective and organizational contextual factors that might impact implementation at eight hospital sites in Alberta, Canada.

methodsWe utilized concepts from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) to understand the context, past implementation experiences, and perceptions of the cirrhosis order set. Eight focus groups were held with healthcare professionals caring for patients with cirrhosis. Data were coded deductively using relevant constructs of NPT and CFIR. A total of 54 healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, social workers and pharmacists and a physiotherapist, participated in the focus groups.

resultsKey findings revealed that participants recognized the value of the cirrhosis order set and its potential to improve the quality of care. Participants highlighted potential implementation challenges, including multiple competing quality improvement initiatives, feelings of burnout, lack of communication between healthcare provider groups, and a lack of dedicated resources to support implementation.

conclusionsImplementing a complex improvement initiative across clinician groups and acute care sites presents challenges. This work yielded insights into the significant influence of past implementation of similar interventions and highlighted the importance of communication between clinician groups and resources to support implementation. However, by using multiple theoretical lenses to illuminate what and how contextual and social processes will influence uptake, we can better anticipate challenges during the implementation process.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAlbertaHumansLiver CirrhosisTertiary Health CareCirrhosisFormative evaluationImplementationImplementation theoryOrder set

Identifiers

PMID37316822
PMCPMC10266314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.