Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37316805›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Comparison of IVF/ICSI outcomes in advanced reproductive age patients with polycystic ovary syndrome and advanced reproductive age normal controls: a retrospective cohort study.

Xing Zhang, Fang Lian, Danqi Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Novel Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xing ZhangShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Fang LianAffiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China. lianfangbangong@163.com.
Danqi LiuShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81974577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt present, there are few studies on whether there is reproductive advantage in advanced polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients, and the existing research results are also controversial. Some research results show that the reproductive window of advanced reproductive age patients with polycystic ovary syndrome is longer than that of the normal control group, and the clinical pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate of in vitro fertilization / intracytoplasmic sperm injection(IVF/ICSI)are higher. However, some studies have contradicted the results, and believed that the clinical pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate in IVF/ICSI in advanced PCOS patients and normal control groups were roughly similar. This retrospective study aimed to compare IVF/ICSI outcomes in advanced reproductive age patients with PCOS and in advanced reproductive age patients with tubal factor infertility alone.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on advanced reproductive age (age ≥ 35 years) patients who received their first IVF/ICSI cycle between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020. This study was divided into two groups, one group was PCOS group, the other group was control group, namely tubal factor infertility group, a total of 312 patients and 462 cycles were enrolled. Compare the differences in outcomes such as cumulative live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate between the two groups.

resultsIn fresh embryo transfer cycles(ET), there was no statistically significant difference in live birth rate [19/62 (30.6%) vs. 34/117 (29.1%), P = 0.825] and clinical pregnancy rate [24/62 (38.7%) vs. 43/117 (36.8%), P = 0.797] between the PCOS and control groups.In the frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle, the difference in cumulative live birth rate [63/217 (29.0%) vs. 14/66 (21.2%), P = 0.211] and clinical pregnancy rate [74/217 (34.1%) vs. 18/66 (27.3%), P = 0.300] were not statistically significant between the two groups.

conclusionsThe IVF/ICSI outcomes of advanced reproductive age patients with PCOS are similar to those of advanced reproductive age patients with tubal factor infertility alone, and the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate are roughly the same. Age is an important factor that affects clinical pregnancy rate. It is recommended that patients with PCOS complicated by infertility seek medical treatment as soon as possible to obtain better pregnancy outcomes.

Indexed as

InfertilityPolycystic Ovary SyndromeAdultFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansMaleMaternal AgePregnancyRetrospective StudiesSemenSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicAdvanced reproductive ageClinical pregnancy rateIVF/ICSILive birth ratePolycystic ovary syndrome

Identifiers

PMID37316805
PMCPMC10265755
OpenAlexW4380682185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.