Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37316802›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2023

Use of Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a scoping review and evidence map.

Minjie Fu, Zhirui Zhou, Xiao Huang, Zhenchao Chen, Licheng Zhang, Jinsen Zhang, Wei Hua, Ying Mao

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
21.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Management of glioblastoma in the elderly.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  4. Bevacizumab: The future of chronic subdural hematoma.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Minjie Fu *Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, #12 Middle Urumqi Road, Shanghai, China.
Zhirui Zhou *Radiation Oncology Center, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao Huang *Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhenchao ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Licheng ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, #12 Middle Urumqi Road, Shanghai, China.
Jinsen ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, #12 Middle Urumqi Road, Shanghai, China.
Wei HuaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, #12 Middle Urumqi Road, Shanghai, China. drhuawei@fudan.edu.cn.
Ying MaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, #12 Middle Urumqi Road, Shanghai, China. maoying@fudan.edu.cn.
Huashan Hospital · CNFudan University · CNShanghai Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Technology · CNShanghai Clinical Research Center · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant primary tumor in the brain, with poor prognosis and limited effective therapies. Although Bevacizumab (BEV) has shown promise in extending progression-free survival (PFS) treating GBM, there is no evidence for its ability to prolong overall survival (OS). Given the uncertainty surrounding BEV treatment strategies, we aimed to provide an evidence map associated with BEV therapy for recurrent GBM (rGBM).

methodsPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for the period from January 1, 1970, to March 1, 2022, for studies reporting the prognoses of patients with rGBM receiving BEV. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL). The secondary endpoints were PFS, steroid use reduction, and risk of adverse effects. A scoping review and an evidence map were conducted to explore the optimal BEV treatment (including combination regimen, dosage, and window of opportunity).

resultsPatients with rGBM could gain benefits in PFS, palliative, and cognitive advantages from BEV treatment, although the OS benefits could not be verified with high-quality evidence. Furthermore, BEV combined therapy (especially with lomustine and radiotherapy) showed higher efficacy than BEV monotherapy in the survival of patients with rGBM. Specific molecular alterations (IDH mutation status) and clinical features (large tumor burden and double-positive sign) could predict better responses to BEV administration. A low dosage of BEV showed equal efficacy to the recommended dose, but the optimal opportunity window for BEV administration remains unclear.

conclusionsAlthough OS benefits from BEV-containing regimens could not be verified in this scoping review, the PFS benefits and side effects control supported BEV application in rGBM. Combining BEV with novel treatments like tumor-treating field (TTF) and administration at first recurrence may optimize the therapeutic efficacy. rGBM with a low apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCL), large tumor burden, or IDH mutation is more likely to benefit from BEV treatment. High-quality studies are warranted to explore the combination modality and identify BEV-response subpopulations to maximize benefits.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsGlioblastomaBevacizumabBrainHumansQuality of LifeBevacizumabBevacizumabCombined therapyQuality of lifeRecurrent glioblastoma

Identifiers

PMID37316802
PMCPMC10265794
OpenAlexW4380684449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.