Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37316785›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical research methodology2023

Use of days alive without life support and similar count outcomes in randomised clinical trials - an overview and comparison of methodological choices and analysis methods.

Anders Granholm, Benjamin Skov Kaas-Hansen, Theis Lange, Marie Warrer Munch, Michael O Harhay, Fernando G Zampieri, Anders Perner, Morten Hylander Møller, Aksel Karl Georg Jensen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical research methodology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04509973 (Higher vs. Lower Doses of Dexamethasone in Patients With COVID-19 and Severe Hypoxia), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04509973 phase3completednot on this map

Higher vs. Lower Doses of Dexamethasone in Patients With COVID-19 and Severe Hypoxia

TypeinterventionalSponsorScandinavian Critical Care Trials GroupRan2020 to 2022Enrolled1,000ConditionsCovid19, HypoxiaArmsDexamethasone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. INCEPT: The Intensive Care Platform Trial-Design and protocol.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  16. Advancing patient-centered metrics for heart transplantation: The role of days alive and outside the hospital.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anders GranholmDepartment of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. andersgran@gmail.com.
Benjamin Skov Kaas-HansenDepartment of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Theis LangeSection of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marie Warrer MunchDepartment of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael O HarhayClinical Trials Methods and Outcomes Lab, Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Fernando G ZampieriHCor Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
Anders PernerDepartment of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten Hylander MøllerDepartment of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Aksel Karl Georg JensenSection of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDays alive without life support (DAWOLS) and similar outcomes that seek to summarise mortality and non-mortality experiences are increasingly used in critical care research. The use of these outcomes is challenged by different definitions and non-normal outcome distributions that complicate statistical analysis decisions.

methodsWe scrutinized the central methodological considerations when using DAWOLS and similar outcomes and provide a description and overview of the pros and cons of various statistical methods for analysis supplemented with a comparison of these methods using data from the COVID STEROID 2 randomised clinical trial. We focused on readily available regression models of increasing complexity (linear, hurdle-negative binomial, zero-one-inflated beta, and cumulative logistic regression models) that allow comparison of multiple treatment arms, adjustment for covariates and interaction terms to assess treatment effect heterogeneity.

resultsIn general, the simpler models adequately estimated group means despite not fitting the data well enough to mimic the input data. The more complex models better fitted and thus better replicated the input data, although this came with increased complexity and uncertainty of estimates. While the more complex models can model separate components of the outcome distributions (i.e., the probability of having zero DAWOLS), this complexity means that the specification of interpretable priors in a Bayesian setting is difficult. Finally, we present multiple examples of how these outcomes may be visualised to aid assessment and interpretation.

conclusionsThis summary of central methodological considerations when using, defining, and analysing DAWOLS and similar outcomes may help researchers choose the definition and analysis method that best fits their planned studies.

trial registrationCOVID STEROID 2 trial, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04509973, ctri.nic.in: CTRI/2020/10/028731.

Indexed as

COVID-19Bayes TheoremCritical CareDietary SupplementsHumansLogistic ModelsSeizuresAnalysis methodsCount outcomesDays alive out of hospitalDays alive without life supportStatistical models

Identifiers

PMID37316785
PMCPMC10266319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.