Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37316754›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2024

Medical oncology workload, workforce census, and needs in Spain: two nationwide studies by the Spanish Society of medical oncology.

Ana Fernandez Montes, Elena Elez, Juan de la Haba-Rodriguez, David Paez, Maria Jose Mendez-Vidal, Enriqueta Felip, Alvaro Rodriguez-Lescure

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Research Survey on Recognition of Medical Oncology among Medical Students and Junior Residents in Japan.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana Fernandez MontesDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Complex of Ourense (CHUO), Ourense, Galicia, Spain. afm1003@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4630-5830
Elena ElezMedical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Univesitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain.
Juan de la Haba-RodriguezMedical Oncology Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research in Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain.
David PaezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Santa Creu I Sant Pau University Hospital, U705, ISCIII Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain.
Maria Jose Mendez-VidalMedical Oncology Department, Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research in Cordoba, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Enriqueta FelipMedical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain.
Alvaro Rodriguez-LescureMedical Oncology Department, Elche General University Hospital, Alicante, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGrowing complexity and demand for cancer care entail increased challenges for Medical Oncology (MO). The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) has promoted studies to provide updated data to estimate the need for medical oncologists in 2040 and to analyse current professional standing of young medical oncologists.

methodsTwo national, online surveys were conducted. The first (2021) targeted 146 Heads of MO Departments, and the second (2022), 775 young medical oncologists who had completed their MO residency between 2014 and 2021. Participants were contacted individually, and data were processed anonymously.

resultsParticipation rates reached 78.8% and 48.8%, respectively. The updated data suggest that 87-110 new medical oncologist full-time equivalents (FTEs) should be recruited each year to achieve an optimal ratio of 110-130 new cases per medical oncologist FTE by 2040. The professional standing analysis reveals that 9.1% of medical oncologists trained in Spain do not work in clinical care in the country, with tremendous employment instability (only 15.2% have a permanent contract). A high percentage of young medical oncologists have contemplated career paths other than clinical care (64.5%) or working in other countries (51.7%).

conclusionsOptimal ratios of medical oncologists must be achieved to tackle the evolution of MO workloads and challenges in comprehensive cancer care. However, the incorporation and permanence of medical oncologists in the national healthcare system in Spain could be compromised by their current sub-optimal professional standing.

Indexed as

OncologistsWorkloadCensusesHumansMedical OncologySpainSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkforceMedical oncologistProfessional standingSEOMSpainWorkforceWorkload

Identifiers

PMID37316754
PMCPMC10266958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.