ArticlePediatric cardiology2024
Comparative Effectiveness of Surgical Ligation and Catheter Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frequency and outcomes of surgical and transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants in Germany-a prospective nationwide hospital-based surveillance study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Effect of Transcatheter Closure of the Ductus Arteriosus on Right Ventricular Function in Preterm Neonates.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Suspected Infective Endocarditis in a Premature Neonate After Patent Ductus Arteriosus Occluder Placement: A Case Report.Case reports in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Complications of Interventional Versus Surgical Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Very Preterm Infants-A Retrospective Analysis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Respiratory Outcomes After Transcatheter vs Surgical Patent Ductus Arteriosus Closure in Preterm Infants.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the association, if any, between closure modality (surgical ligation SL vs. catheter CC) of a hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), after failure of or contraindication to medical therapy, and immediate procedural complications, and post-procedure physiologic status in preterm (gestational age < 32 weeks) infants. In this single-center retrospective cohort study, data were accessed on infants < 32 weeks gestation, who underwent SL or CC of PDA, born from 2019-2021. The choice of modality was determined by parents, after they were provided information on both procedures. Our cohort (n = 112) included 36 (32.1%) infants who underwent SL while 76 (67.9%) underwent CC. The SL group of infants were significantly more immature at birth, younger on admission to the level IV NICU and received more mean (SD) surfactant doses than the CC group. Higher proportions of infants in the SL group had 5-min Apgar scores ≤ 5, seizures, severe intracranial hemorrhage and had received medical therapy for PDA. Both procedures were highly efficacious, with 1 unsuccessful device placement attempt and had low associated adverse events. Two (2.6%) infants had device migration 24 h after CC. SL was associated with a higher rate of immediate postoperative hypothermia whereas, in the CC group, mean airway pressure was significantly lower 48 h after, compared to before the procedure. SL and CC are comparable in short-term efficacy and safety for PDA closure. Long-term outcomes data are needed following both procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37316609What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.