Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37316589›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2023

Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in predicting the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification in neuroblastoma.

Haoru Wang, Mingye Xie, Xin Chen, Jin Zhu, Li Zhang, Hao Ding, Zhengxia Pan, Ling He

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haoru WangDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 136 Zhongshan Road 2, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Mingye XieDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 136 Zhongshan Road 2, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Xin ChenDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 136 Zhongshan Road 2, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Jin ZhuDepartment of Pathology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 136 Zhongshan Road 2, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Li ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 136 Zhongshan Road 2, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Hao DingDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 136 Zhongshan Road 2, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China.
Zhengxia PanDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 136 Zhongshan Road 2, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China. panzhengxia005@sina.com.
Ling HeDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, No. 136 Zhongshan Road 2, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400014, China. doctorheling@yeah.net.
Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNChongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

Basic Research and Frontier Exploration Project (Yuzhong District, Chongqing, China) 20200155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo predict the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (INPC) in neuroblastoma using a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics approach.

methodsWe enrolled 297 patients with neuroblastoma retrospectively and divided them into a training group (n = 208) and a testing group (n = 89). To balance the classes in the training group, a Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique was applied. A logistic regression radiomics model based on the radiomics features after dimensionality reduction was then constructed and validated in both the training and testing groups. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the radiomics model, the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration curve were utilized. Moreover, the decision curve analysis to assess the net benefits of the radiomics model at different high-risk thresholds was employed.

resultsSeventeen radiomics features were used to construct radiomics model. In the training group, radiomics model achieved an area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.851 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.805-0.897), 0.770, 0.694, and 0.847, respectively. In the testing group, radiomics model achieved an AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.816 (95% CI 0.725-0.906), 0.787, 0.793, and 0.778, respectively. The calibration curve indicated that the radiomics model was well fitted in both the training and testing groups (p > 0.05). Decision curve analysis further confirmed that the radiomics model performed well at different high-risk thresholds.

conclusionRadiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates favorable diagnostic capabilities in distinguishing the INPC subgroups of neuroblastoma. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Radiomics features of contrast-enhanced CT images correlate with the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (INPC) of neuroblastoma.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyNeuroblastomaPathologyRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID37316589
PMCPMC10267098
OpenAlexW4380628083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.