Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37316588›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2023

Assessments of dentate gyrus function: discoveries and debates.

Mia Borzello, Steve Ramirez, Alessandro Treves, Inah Lee, Helen Scharfman, Craig Stark, James J Knierim, Lara M Rangel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Semantic encoding of trauma memories in the hippocampus among individuals with PTSD.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dynamics of Dentate Gyrus Place Cells and Dentate Spikes during Spatial and Nonspatial Changes in Environments.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mia BorzelloDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9564-3209
Steve RamirezDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Alessandro TrevesCognitive Neuroscience, SISSA, Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7246-5673
Inah LeeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3760-4257
Helen ScharfmanDepartments of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Neuroscience and Physiology and Psychiatry and the Neuroscience Institute, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Craig StarkDepartment of Neurobiology and Behaviour, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9334-8502
James J KnierimKrieger Mind/Brain Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1796-2930
Lara M RangelDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. lrangel@ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9739-256X

Funding

MULTI-SITE ANALYSIS OF HIPPOCAMPAL NEURONAL ENSEMBLESR01NS039456 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI JAMES J KNIERIM · 2000 to 2026
$9.1M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCET32MH020002 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SEJNOWSKI, TERRENCE J · 1999 to 2020
$6.1M
Investigating the impact of rhythmic cortical inputs upon associative memory processing in the hippocampusR03MH120406 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI RANGEL, LARA MARIA · 2020 to 2020
$158k
NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH120406NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH020002NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been considerable speculation regarding the function of the dentate gyrus (DG) - a subregion of the mammalian hippocampus - in learning and memory. In this Perspective article, we compare leading theories of DG function. We note that these theories all critically rely on the generation of distinct patterns of activity in the region to signal differences between experiences and to reduce interference between memories. However, these theories are divided by the roles they attribute to the DG during learning and recall and by the contributions they ascribe to specific inputs or cell types within the DG. These differences influence the information that the DG is thought to impart to downstream structures. We work towards a holistic view of the role of DG in learning and memory by first developing three critical questions to foster a dialogue between the leading theories. We then evaluate the extent to which previous studies address our questions, highlight remaining areas of conflict, and suggest future experiments to bridge these theories.

Indexed as

Dentate GyrusHippocampusAnimalsHumansLearningMammalsMental Recall

Identifiers

PMID37316588
PMCPMC10529488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.