Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37316447›Full record

ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2023

[Establishment and Verification of Benign and Malignant Prediction Model of 
Subcentimeter Pulmonary Ground Glass Nodules Based on HRCT].

Zhengwei Chen, Gaoxiang Wang, Hanran Wu, Mingsheng Wu, Xianning Wu, Meiqing Xu, Mingran Xie

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhengwei ChenWannan Medical College, Wuhu 241001, China.
Gaoxiang WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of 
Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230001, China.
Hanran WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of 
Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230001, China.
Mingsheng WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of 
Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230001, China.
Xianning WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of 
Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230001, China.
Meiqing XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of 
Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230001, China.
Mingran XieDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of 
Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230001, China.
Wannan Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPre-operative accuracy of subcentimeter ground glass nodules (SGGNs) is a difficult problem in clinical practice, but there are few clinical studies on the benign and malignant prediction model of SGGNs. The aim of this study was to help identify benign and malignant lesions of SGGNs based on the imaging features of high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and the general clinical data of patients, and to build a risk prediction model.

methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 483 patients with SGGNs who underwent surgical resection and were confirmed by histology from the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China from August 2020 to December 2021. The patients were divided into the training set (n=338) and the validation set (n=145) according to 7:3 random assignment. According to the postoperative histology, they were divided into adenocarcinoma group and benign lesion group. The independent risk factors and models were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate Logistic regression. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to evaluate the model differentiation, and the calibration curve was used to evaluate the model consistency. The clinical application value of the decision curve analysis (DCA) evaluation model was drawn, and the validation set data was substituted for external verification.

resultsMultivariate Logistic analysis screened out patients' age, vascular sign, lobular sign, nodule volume and mean-CT value as independent risk factors for SGGNs. Based on the results of multivariate analysis, Nomogram prediction model was constructed, and the area under ROC curve was 0.836 (95%CI: 0.794-0.879). The critical value corresponding to the maximum approximate entry index was 0.483. The sensitivity was 76.6%, and the specificity was 80.1%. The positive predictive value was 86.5%, and the negative predictive value was 68.7%. The benign and malignant risk of SGGNs predicted by the calibration curve was highly consistent with the actual occurrence risk after sampling 1,000 times using Bootstrap method. DCA showed that patients showed a positive net benefit when the predictive probability of the predicted model probability was 0.2 to 0.9.

conclusionsBased on preoperative medical history and preoperative HRCT examination indicators, the benign and malignant risk prediction model of SGGNs was established to have good predictive efficacy and clinical application value. The visualization of Nomogram can help to screen out high-risk groups of SGGNs, providing support for clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaLung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesChinaHospitalsHumansRetrospective StudiesBenign and malignant lesionsHigh resolution computed tomographyNomogramPrediction modelSubcentimeter pulmonary ground glass nodules

Identifiers

PMID37316447
PMCPMC10273148
OpenAlexW4380730238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.