Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37316428›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2023

cMUT technology developments.

Carl D Herickhoff, Rob van Schaijk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Radiation Impedance of Rectangular CMUTs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. CMUT as a Transmitter for Microbubble-Assisted Blood-Brain Barrier Opening.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2024
    Article
  7. Therapeutic ultrasound transducer technology and monitoring techniques: a review with clinical examples.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carl D HerickhoffDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Memphis, TN, USA. Electronic address: carl.herickhoff@memphis.edu.
Rob van SchaijkPhilips MEMS & Micro Devices, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (cMUT) technology has steadily advanced since its advent in the mid-1990's. Though cMUTs have not supplanted piezoelectric transducers for medical ultrasound imaging to date, researchers and engineers are continuing to improve cMUTs and leverage unique cMUT characteristics toward new applications. While not intended to be an exhaustive review of every aspect of cMUT state-of-the-art, this article provides a brief overview of cMUT benefits, challenges, and opportunities, as well as recent progress in cMUT research and translation.

Indexed as

Industrial DevelopmentUltrasonicsEquipment DesignTransducersUltrasonographyCMUTImagingTransducerUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID37316428
PMCPMC10517396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.