Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37316372›Full record

ArticleSurgery2023

A deep learning-based dynamic model for predicting acute kidney injury risk severity in postoperative patients.

Esra Adiyeke, Yuanfang Ren, Matthew M Ruppert, Benjamin Shickel, Sandra L Kane-Gill, Raghavan Murugan, Parisa Rashidi, Azra Bihorac, Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Esra AdiyekeUniversity of Florida Intelligent Critical Care Center, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Yuanfang RenUniversity of Florida Intelligent Critical Care Center, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Matthew M RuppertUniversity of Florida Intelligent Critical Care Center, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Benjamin ShickelUniversity of Florida Intelligent Critical Care Center, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Electronic address: http://www.twitter.com/BenjaminShickel.
Sandra L Kane-GillDepartment of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Raghavan MuruganDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Parisa RashidiUniversity of Florida Intelligent Critical Care Center, Gainesville, FL; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Electronic address: http://www.twitter.com/Parisa__Rashidi.
Azra BihoracUniversity of Florida Intelligent Critical Care Center, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Electronic address: abihorac@ufl.edu.
Tezcan Ozrazgat-BaslantiUniversity of Florida Intelligent Critical Care Center, Gainesville, FL; Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Renal Transplantation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. Electronic address: http://www.twitter.com/TBaslanti.
University of Florida · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USTwitter (United States) · US

Funding

UF Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000064 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NELSON, DAVID R · 2012 to 2014
$12.2M
(MEnD-AKI) Multicenter Implementation of an Electronic Decision Support System for Drug-associated AKIR01DK121730 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BIHORAC, AZRA, KANE-GILL, SANDRA L · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
Development and Validation of Computational Algorithms to Assess Kidney Health in Electronic Health RecordsK01DK120784 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI OZRAZGAT BASLANTI, TEZCAN · 2020 to 2023
$580k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000064NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK120784NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK121730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute kidney injury is a common postoperative complication affecting between 10% and 30% of surgical patients. Acute kidney injury is associated with increased resource usage and chronic kidney disease development, with more severe acute kidney injury suggesting more aggressive deterioration in clinical outcomes and mortality.

methodsWe considered 42,906 surgical patients admitted to University of Florida Health (n = 51,806) between 2014 and 2021. Acute kidney injury stages were determined using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes serum creatinine criteria. We developed a recurrent neural network-based model to continuously predict acute kidney injury risk and state in the following 24 hours and compared it with logistic regression, random forest, and multi-layer perceptron models. We used medications, laboratory and vital measurements, and derived features from past one-year records as inputs. We analyzed the proposed model with integrated gradients for enhanced explainability.

resultsPostoperative acute kidney injury at any stage developed in 20% (10,664) of the cohort. The recurrent neural network model was more accurate in predicting nearly all categories of next-day acute kidney injury stages (including the no acute kidney injury group). The area under the receiver operating curve and 95% confidence intervals for recurrent neural network and logistic regression models were for no acute kidney injury (0.98 [0.98-0.98] vs 0.93 [0.93-0.93]), stage 1 (0.95 [0.95-0.95] vs. 0.81 [0.80-0.82]), stage 2/3 (0.99 [0.99-0.99] vs 0.96 [0.96-0.97]), and stage 3 with renal replacement therapy (1.0 [1.0-1.0] vs 1.0 [1.0-1.0].

conclusionThe proposed model demonstrates that temporal processing of patient information can lead to more granular and dynamic modeling of acute kidney injury status and result in more continuous and accurate acute kidney injury prediction. We showcase the integrated gradients framework's utility as a mechanism for enhancing model explainability, potentially facilitating clinical trust for future implementation.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryDeep LearningForecastingHumansKidneyLogistic Models

Identifiers

PMID37316372
PMCPMC10683578
OpenAlexW4380344046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.